**Blind review is relatively unlikely, but not impossible, to be killed for the topic selection. In the blind review process, the reviewers will evaluate the content, quality, and innovation of the journal to determine whether it meets the academic requirements and the publication standards of the journal.
Although the selection of the topic is crucial to the success of the **, in the blind review process, the reviewers usually pay more attention to the quality and innovation of the ** itself. Therefore, if the topic selection is appropriate, the research method is reasonable, the results are reliable, the discussion is in-depth, and the logic is rigorous, then even if the topic selection is not a field that the review experts are very familiar with, it will not have much impact on the review results of the first grade.
However, if the topic is too unpopular or too narrow, or there are obvious flaws in the research methodology, or the results are unreliable, the discussion is not in-depth, and the logic is not rigorous, then it may leave a negative impression on the review experts, which will affect the review results of **.
In order to reduce the risk of being killed due to topic selection, it is recommended that authors should fully consider the breadth of the research field and the publication standards of the journal when selecting the topic, and pay attention to the quality and innovation of the journal. In the process of writing, it is necessary to ensure that the structure of the ** is clear, the logic is rigorous, the language is fluent, and the expression is accurate. In addition, the data and conclusions in ** should be fully discussed and analyzed, and sufficient references should be provided.
In conclusion, although it is relatively unlikely that blind reviewers will be killed for topic selection, authors still need to take the topic selection and writing process seriously to ensure that the quality and innovation of the project are fully demonstrated, thereby increasing the chances of being accepted.