A few days ago, a professor at Wuhan University was reported by his ex-wife with his real name for violent tendencies and a number of inappropriate behaviors, and for a while he became a "scumbag". Soon, however, a group of the professor's acquaintances and students came forward to justify him, calling him an upright man and a noble medical man. This obvious reversal of identity and cognition makes us have to think deeply: what kind of judgment attitude is needed to construct a conclusion in a dispute?
In fact, in this era when information is easily taken out of context, we are easily influenced by a single voice and form superficial cognitions. Whether it is a so-called "scumbag" or a "good person", it may be the result of a limited perspective. Therefore, the rational action is to listen to the opinions of different parties, analyze the facts as objectively and comprehensively as possible, and then construct their own understanding.
In this case, we must first make it clear that domestic violence and other behaviors should not be tolerated. But at the same time, the dedication of the reported person in medical treatment is also worth paying attention to. Because human nature is inherently complex, it should not be simply black and white. So we need to be cautious and avoid misplacing one's attributes.
Secondly, it also makes us realize that any judgment about others should not be based on one-sided information. We need to gather input from as many different perspectives as possible to uncover the truth. Because evaluation based on limited understanding is very easy to make mistakes.
Furthermore, this incident is a reminder that we cannot simply equate an individual's moral character with his or her professional ability. A person may fail in some areas, but he or she excels in others. Therefore, as spectators, we need to understand a person comprehensively and avoid denying the whole from a single perspective.
Therefore, this reversal of professorial identity inspires us to be more rational, comprehensive and tolerant when evaluating others. Because the state of individual life is diverse and changing, we need to seek common ground in tolerance and learn from differences, which is also the main theme of social progress in this era.
This professor's identity reversal from "scumbag" to "good man" enlightens us with many questions worth reflecting on:
First, in the age of information, we are easily influenced by a single voice and form superficial judgments. The rational move is to collect as much information as possible and analyze the facts objectively and comprehensively.
Second, the evaluation of a person should not be based solely on one-sided material. Because we need to identify a more realistic state and avoid simplistic labeling. This requires us to actively accumulate input and understand the essence of the facts.
Third, personal conduct and professional aptitude are not necessarily linked. A person may have problems in some areas but excel in others. So we can't use personal moral circumstances to negate the totality of a person.
Fourth, human attributes are diverse and changing. Therefore, when judging others, we need to seek common ground in tolerance and learn from differences. Only in this way can we build a rational and harmonious society.
Therefore, the enlightenment of this case is of great significance. It reminds us that in this day and age, we need to be more rational, open-minded, and tolerant in constructing understandings and conclusions about a person and an event. Because the nature of human nature is complex and changeable, we need to have a broad mind to deal with this complexity.
In this way, the world will become brighter, because the sun is always bluer than blue. The seeds of tolerance and understanding will eventually blossom into the flowers of tolerance and symbiosis. This is also the only coordinate of social progress.