Huawei loses the lawsuit!Sweden didn't expect the 'backlash' of 5G devices to come so quickly!
Preface. In recent years, the United States and many Western countries have launched a comprehensive crackdown on Huawei, which has made it difficult for Huawei to move forward in the international market. However, with tenacious perseverance and independent R&D capabilities, Huawei successfully defeated itself and achieved nirvana rebirth. Against this backdrop, Sweden chose to dismantle 5G equipment, but did not expect this move to cause"**"and eventually lost the case. In this article, we will discuss Huawei's defeat and analyze the unexpected circumstances that led to its defeat.
The background of Huawei's troubles.
Ever since Huawei touched the American capitalist"Comfort zone"Later, the United States and other Western countries launched a series of supply cuts and smear actions against Huawei. Huawei's chips, operating system, and ** chain have been significantly damaged, and Huawei's 5G technology has also been labeled"Hidden dangers"tags. The United States, France, Germany, and other countries have ordered the dismantling of China's 5G equipment. However, Huawei's 5G equipment has been publicly evaluated by international authorities and proved that it has no insecurity factors, which is better and more cost-effective than Ericsson and Nokia, which are also 5G equipment manufacturers. This clearly proves that the accusations of the United States are just groundless, prompting France, Germany, Italy and other Western countries to renew their requests to cooperate with Huawei. However, Sweden has insisted on withdrawing Huawei's 5G equipment, and has even announced that it will withdraw all of it by 2025.
Behind Sweden's demolition of 5G equipment.
Sweden as"Seven Permanently Neutral States"members of the club in recent years have been a role model. It not only froze Russian assets, but also provided military aid to Ukraine. These actions have not only disintegrated countries such as Switzerland"Permanently neutral"The image has also played a role in the international market"Fanning the flames"role. However, Sweden never expected that the withdrawal of Huawei's 5G equipment would be triggered"**"。Sweden's Ericsson issued a statement saying that it would leave Sweden if Sweden continues to ban and withdraw Huawei's 5G equipment. This statement suggests that Sweden's repeal is essentially aimed at bringing more market share to its own brand. However, the data shows that Ericsson's share of China's main wireless equipment market (5G segment) continued to decline in the second and third quarters of 2023, falling by 63% and 74%, respectively. Sweden's ban has also sparked a backlash from domestic consumers, who don't buy Chinese brands and we don't buy their products. Our market of 9.6 million square kilometers is clearly more attractive than Sweden's market of 450,000 square kilometers. Even if Ericsson dominates the entire Swedish market, the loss of the Chinese market will not outweigh the losses. Therefore, Ericsson's statement is in line with the market situation and decision-making needs.
Huawei unexpectedly lost the case.
Huawei appealed Sweden's abrogation, hoping to defend its rights. However, a Swedish court took a similar approach to India and ruled against Huawei. This result was unexpected, especially considering Sweden"Permanently neutral"status and reputation, it seems to have no scruples about aligning itself with the United States. But what message does this verdict send to the outside world?First, it shows that Sweden is no longer so-called in the US-China game"Neutral country", but unilaterally in favor of the United States. Second, Sweden has shown an unfair attitude towards Huawei and Chinese companies in this case. Finally, the judgment of the Swedish court has a certain impact on the Swedish state-owned enterprise Ericsson, because Huawei is the most famous company in the field of 5G equipment, and China also has ZTE, Datang Mobile and other companies in the same field, which can provide reliable local equipment. Therefore, regardless of whether Ericsson leaves Sweden or not, it is still a better option to adopt local equipment.
Conclusion. Huawei's defeat is a deep surprise, exposing not only Sweden's unbalanced attitude in the game between China and the United States, but also Sweden's unfair practices towards Huawei and Chinese companies. At the same time, Sweden's dismantling has also attracted resistance and counterattack from companies such as Ericsson. As consumers and businesses, we must recognize that technology and market demand are key factors driving the development of the industry, and any unfair practices will be opposed by the market and consumers. In the face of Huawei's defeat, we must adhere to the pursuit of justice and justice, and at the same time, we must also see the competitive strength and development potential of national enterprises in the field of 5G equipment. Through independent research and development and the application of localized equipment, we can promote the development of China's 5G industry more stably and reliably, and achieve broader market prospects.