I don't know if you still remember, the subway ** incident in Chengdu at the beginning?At that time, it was two young girls who pointed directly at a boy and scolded:"You're definitely a**us, your shoes have a camera!”But the boy was simply framed, so he immediately took the two girls to court, but the two girls did not dare to appear in court ......Now, the first trial of the "Chengdu Metro ** Incident" has come, and the verdict has instantly attracted the attention of 5 million people!
Just yesterday, a court in Chengdu made a statement against Mr. He, the party who was framedAll of his claims were dismissed!Such a verdict made 5 million netizens angry. My cousin will first take you to briefly review what happened at that time:After having dinner with his classmates, Mr. Ho chose to take the subway home. I kindly gave up my seat halfway, so I stood on the armrest in the middle of the carriage. 
Mr. He faced two young girls, namely Luo Moumou and Zeng Moumou. It was fine, but the two girls suddenly shouted:"Are you a**me?!”
This shout frightened Mr. Ho, and he looked puzzled, and then the security officer rushed over. It turned out that the two girls noticed that Mr. He's shoes were "flashing green", so they thought there was a camera. Then the passers-by around didn't know why, and they all frowned and glared at the young man. 
Mr. Ho has suffered an unwarranted disaster!Everyone asked him to take off his shoes and check ......There was no way, Mr. He was forced to take off his shoes and socks, and the two girls who shouted "**" tied their mobile phones and took pictures at Mr. He. Later, some passers-by discovered that Mr. He's shoes had a metal material, which would cause the illusion of "flickering"!But the two girls didn't care, they still scolded Mr. He, for a young boy, it was really !. death
Such an unreasonable false accusation is something that Mr. He cannot accept. So he collected evidence to sue the two girls and demanded that they apologize. 
As a result, the court dismissed all of Mr. Ho's claims. 
The reason given by the court is this: because after the incident became popular, more details were brought. At that time, the incident was caused by 11:17 p.m., and the police office of the subway seriously checked Mr. He's shoes and socks ...... again
Then the two girls, Luo Moumou and Zeng Moumou, entered the police room and bowed to Mr. He to apologize:"I'm sorry handsome, we misunderstood you. ”My cousin wants to say that an apology is necessary, but is this matter as simple as just apologizing?
A young man, because he was "watched" by the whole carriage for no reason, was forced to take off his shoes, and his socks were slapped indiscriminately. Afterwards, the two girls even dragged him to the wall and stood for 30 minutes!Claiming that he was afraid that he would "destroy evidence", the incident made trouble until 11 o'clock in the evening. Why are there so many things?If you don't have it, you don't have it, if you don't accept it, call the police, and restrict the freedom of othersSo Mr. He was still very emotional and refused their apology. 
Later, the two girls offered to give Mr. He a "taxi fare", but Mr. He directly refused. Later, the court held that after the dispute came out, the onlookers did not post some information on the Internet, so it was not known to many people, and the impact was not great. 
Moreover, the subway staff also performed their duties normally, and there was no subjective fault.
And Mr. He made more requests:The first is to ask the two girls and Chengdu Metro to publish an apology statement and read it out for 10 consecutive days. The second is that the two girls have to compensate for economic losses and mental damages, a total of 50,000 yuan.
The court did not reject these claims. And it is worth mentioning that at that time, the two girls did not dare to appear ......Now, in the face of such a verdict, Mr. Ho is very disappointed. "But I tend to continue appealing. ”As soon as this ** was issued, major netizens supported Mr. He.
"I support your appeal, and I am willing to donate if there is financial difficulties, after all, we may encounter the situation of being framed!”"Hell, what should I do if I have these shoes too?".Can you still wear it?”
"Presumably, the court is also under a lot of pressure to make this judgment, but under the current pressure, can the trial conclusion report be made public?”The comment area is all in support of Mr. He.
After all, justice cannot be "killed", and the truth will always exist. reminds me of a saying back then: "Don't be afraid of broken bones, you must leave your innocence in the world." ”
The framed Mr. He is just a microcosm of thousands of people, because we are also likely to encounter such things in our lives. You can choose to be silent, but don't ridicule and denigrate a person who has the courage to speak up.
The light he has won may shine on our heads. What do you think about this?Radio.
Support Mr. Ho's continued appeal!
Why hold on to the two girls?
I have my opinion, see you in the comment section.
Vote. I don't know what everyone thinks?Let's take a look at what netizens think!The heart is like a 250612984 water:
After that, as long as someone wantonly suspects others without verification on the grounds of safeguarding the public interest and their own interests, so that they delay their time and slander others' reputation, they can be considered legitimate, then what human rights are there?Even if you don't need to apologize publicly, you should apologize in other ways, even if it is an apology in court, at least it can make the public feel that anyone's rights and interests cannot be violated at will!
Unpretentious river Q:
She thinks that there is a flash on the upper of the shoe and thinks it is a headshot, so that she can disturb others and stop them from traveling, and go to the police office to prove her innocenceWhat kind of jurisprudence is this!
Under one person:
The man's innocence ≠ innocence, and the judge is second