Why is it so difficult to ban fingertip formalism?What issues are receiving special attention?
Bihan Fengwen.
Recently, the rectification of fingertip formalism has attracted attention. Among them, there are several aspects that hit the pain points, and the network information department has put forward precise rectification measures.
First, except for special provisions such as security and emergency response, government applications are not allowed to set mandatory functions such as punching in and in, ranking points, and ** duration.
It is indeed incomprehensible about punching in, people who really work often forget to punch in and don't care about punching in, it is precisely people who don't work who pay attention to punching in and out all day long. What exactly is reflected in this, not the work.
Second, it is not allowed to force promotion**, it is not allowed to limit the installation and usage rate of users, and it is not mandatory to require regular login. In the work group, it is not allowed to deviate from the actual work to require clock-in solitaire and instant response, and it is not allowed to arbitrarily assign tasks or ask for materials.
In this regard, the performance is more prominent, some places and units to the assessment ranking requirements for installation, and some grass-roots units even spend money to hire people to install, miserable.
Third, subordinate and grassroots units shall not be arbitrarily required to upload unnecessary screenshots or ** through government affairs applications and work groups.
Fourth, it is not allowed to abuse the attention and likes of government affairs applications and government affairs public accounts, and must not use them as the basis for evaluation, evaluation, and selection.
In this regard, it is ridiculous that it is a business department, but it has to have a headache for these attentions.
Fifth, for the same matter or data at the grassroots level, in principle, it should be submitted through a "one-stop" comprehensive platform and a "one table" to achieve data exchange and information sharing, and prevent multiple fillings and repeated requests for data.
It should be said that the above phenomena have appeared for many years and have attracted the attention of all parties, but they have not been fundamentally solved
First, there are problems in the outlook on the performance of some leaders. A department staff member said frankly that the visit rate and update rate of a certain aspect are prone to fraud when it comes to real assessment, but some leaders are keen on the assessment of these aspects, requiring the grassroots level to visit and the relevant data to be updated, and as a result, there is a large amount of fraudulent data at the grassroots level. Still, some leaders feel good. Because, this can reflect his work deployment, work intentions, and work ideas, and reflect that he has arranged the work and promoted the work, whether it is objective and true, and it is impossible to check it one by one, and the data is good-looking.
Second, informatization does have its incomparable advantages, such as convenience and speed, mastery of information and other advantages. This is also the reason why all departments and units at all levels attach more importance to informatization. After all, from the perspective of the way and path of data and information mastery, there is no way that can compare with informatization. Therefore, the path of completely banning informatization is not right, and it must be used, and the key is how to prevent it from moving towards formalism.
The third is that there are places at the momentMisuse of informatization projects and image engineering. This is a relatively prominent problem, that is, some places are not through informatization to improve efficiency, but only as an image project, as a project for leaders to visit and display, not to solve a certain outstanding problem, naturally it is difficult to achieve the desired effect.
Fourth, some localities and units have maximized formalism through informatization. Now some places are engaged in formalism, that is, the ledger data, the mountains and the sea, it is estimated that some places and units have felt that the ledger information is not enjoyable, either it is to push the first or to push the information, it has become a kind of involution, as for whether there is real effect, it is not important. This goes against the true meaning of informatization.
Therefore, informationization at the fingertips is necessary and very important, and the key is to prevent formalism, truly do practical things for the masses, and improve the efficiency of government affairs.