When the liuzhi investigation began, everyone knew that at that moment, the case-handling personnel of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision took action and usually took ** away from the venue, leaving the participants present with stunned faces.
However, what are the hallmark signs of the end of this liuzhi investigation?Let's take a look.
1. Sign the special "meeting materials".
In the course of the investigation, there was a crucial document called "Facts of Violations of Discipline and Law". The main purpose of this document is to put all the confirmed facts on the table so that the detainees can "meet" one by one, in short, so that you can clearly understand all the allegations.
The content of this material is very comprehensive, touching on every issue of the detainees, like a thorough summary. Such an approach not only helps to prevent miscarriage of justice and wrongful convictions, but also reflects full respect for the right to know of the person in custody. When this step is reached, it means that all the facts that need to be investigated are clear, and it marks the end of the investigation.
2. Notify the family members to return the illegal gains
The recovery of ill-gotten gains is a key link in dealing with cases such as ** or **. The establishment of liability is only the beginning, and the restitution of illicit proceeds is essential to achieve legal effect.
In addition, in order to improve work efficiency and avoid scattered and redundant handling, the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision must thoroughly investigate and confirm all relevant matters before issuing a notice to the family members to return the stolen goods, so that the family members can pay off all illegal gains at one time. Therefore, when family members are notified to return stolen goods, it is often a clear signal that the investigation is nearing the end of the liuzhi investigation.
3. Conversations with the adjudicators
In the course of the investigation of the case, in addition to the communication between the case-handling personnel and the detainees, the special dialogue of the adjudicators also plays a key role. What is the situation?
After all the facts have been investigated, the case will be transferred from the case-handling agency to the trial body. The role of the adjudication body is to conduct a comprehensive review of the case in order to identify and correct any potential wrongful convictions or problems in the course of handling the case. Its core review methods include a detailed review of case documents and direct interviews with the detainees. Therefore, once the detainees find out that the adjudicators have come to talk to them, it can be understood that their case has been clarified and entered the trial stage, which also means that the entire investigation process is about to reach the end.
4. Write a confession of reflection
As a matter of fact, the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision attaches the most importance to the actual results in handling cases. An effective outcome is not only to thoroughly investigate all the facts of violations of discipline and law, but also to guide the detainees in custody to deeply reflect and sincerely recognize their mistakes, so as to truly prevent the recurrence of similar acts and play a role in saving and educating them.
In this process, the writing of a confession of reflection by the person in custody is an important manifestation of his attitude towards admitting his mistakes. For example, a person who violated discipline and law, Wang Moumou, wrote a confession expressing deep remorse: I promise to use the rest of my life to pass on my lessons and warn those around me to avoid repeating mistakes. At the same time, it is emphasized to tell family and relatives about their mistakes, remind them to obey the law, resist illegal acts, and learn from their own experiences.
Once you get to the writing stage of a confession, it usually means that the case is about to enter the closing stage. Therefore, when the investigators began to prompt the person in custody to write a confession, it also indicated that the curtain of the liuzhi investigation was about to fall.
* The experience of being retained in custody for review and investigation by the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision is undoubtedly extremely difficult and torturous. This is a constant reminder to all state public officials that only by abiding by their duties, knowing their responsibilities, using their powers prudently, and doing things in a down-to-earth manner can they make steady progress on the road of serving officials and engaging in politics.