The interaction between teachers and students has always been delicate and complex. Especially at the stage of college students and graduate students, as adults, the relationship with the supervisor needs to be carefully managed, and strive to obtain the recognition and support of the supervisor in order to benefit a lot. There is no end to the path of scientific research, and more and more university students are choosing to pursue a graduate degree, but it is not easy to graduate and obtain a degree. In particular, students need to be recognized by their mentors to increase the likelihood of graduation. However, it is not made up out of thin air, and it is not enough to write a few sentences casually. From the selection of topics to the structure to the details of the content, they need to be carefully crafted, and there is no room for sloppiness. For students, revising ** is often a "difficult to get to the sky" thing, especially if you have to endure harsh criticism from your tutor, which can be said to be even worse. Graduates** or academic** need to be repeatedly revised and refined in order to meet the requirements of their supervisors and the standards of the academic community. Students put a lot of effort into the topic selection and writing content, but when they hand it over to their tutors for review, the tutors will give targeted criticism and suggestions. From the perspective of the tutor, it seems that the graduates are not satisfactory, and this kind of yin and yang attitude is unbearable. But in fact, this is the tutors who are guiding the students responsibly, hoping that they can write better **.
At the college and graduate levels, students are already adults, and they should have a certain grasp of theoretical knowledge and academic literacy in scientific research, and these qualities should be reflected in the first grade. However, when students submit ** to their tutors for review, they are often met with harsh criticism from their tutors. The tutors will question the students' ** and make suggestions for improvement in a tone that seems to be yin and yang. This style of instruction may be frustrating or frustrating for students, but in reality, the tutor's criticism is to help students improve their academic and writing skills. In the eyes of students, they may think that their ** has been written perfectly, but the criticism of the tutor will make them feel their inadequacy obviously. From the supervisor's point of view, this criticism is not exactly an accusation against the student, but through the guidance and modification of the student**, to help them better complete their own research work.
Whether it's undergraduate**or graduate**, writing needs to be revised and refined repeatedly. The ** of undergraduates is relatively simple, as long as you are willing to work hard, the difficulty of ** is not great. As long as the word count and format meet the requirements, you can basically have a high pass rate. However, graduate students** are more demanding. Not only is it required that the number of words reaches a certain standard, but more importantly, it is more important to ensure that the content is appropriate to the topic and there can be no moisture component. When students think they have written perfectly, their tutors classify it as a "draft". Such criticism undoubtedly brought a certain blow to the students' self-esteem. Graduate students should have a clear understanding and correct attitude in terms of mastery of academic theories and understanding of scientific research methods. These qualities should be displayed in **. However, when the students showed their written ** to the tutor, the tutor's response was, "Are you sure you took the test yourself?".Didn't borrow someone else's means?This kind of answer made the students feel confused and helpless. However, in the eyes of the tutor, writing is not just about citing some classic literature to argue a point, but also requires students to show their own opinions and creative ability. For the acknowledgments, students may be more proficient. As long as you sincerely express your gratitude, there is basically no need to revise it. However, in some cases, the tutor will criticize the student's acknowledgment and perceive it as a false accusation. Although the students just wrote the name of the tutor in the acknowledgment, it caused the tutor to be angry, which fully shows that the tutor knows how to use the yin and yang tone to criticize the students' **.
Revisions have become the norm for students. If you don't need to revise it and complete it directly, the student may feel uneasy, worried that the tutor will "break the jar" or feel that theirs are really "hopeless". However, the student's ** level also has a scale in the mind of the tutor. Young, conscientious and responsible tutors will patiently guide students on how to revise**. And old professors with prestige, they may find it easy for their students, but students learn very little from them. For students, writing is an opportunity to improve not only their academic writing skills, but also their analytical and problem-solving skills. However, writing ** is not just a matter of one person, the patience and tolerance of the mentor is also very important. It seems to me that although the tutor criticizes the student** as "worthless", they will still instruct the student on how to revise it. Students should remember that the tutor can tolerate your mistakes, but not to an unlimited extent. Students need to grasp the limits, take them seriously, and don't be perfunctory.
Graduation** is a part that students should not overlook, and students should not fail to live up to the expectations and patient guidance of their mentors. Students should cherish this precious time Xi and complete the writing work seriously. It is very important to have the right mindset when students are writing **. When students are in a good state of mind, they are able to cope with difficulties calmly and write high-quality ** no longer have difficulty. However, if students don't have the right attitude and stubbornly insist on their opinions, then ** is likely to become ignorant. Students need to keep their minds rational, not to be distracted by other things, and to focus on writing. Don't be afraid of being criticized and criticized by your mentor, and you should see your mentor's advice and opinions as an opportunity to improve yourself. Students can take the initiative to seek advice from their mentors and Xi their extensive experience and expertise. After all, the tutor is the mentor and mentor of the students, and they have a wealth of experience and high requirements for the students. Therefore, students need to approach their mentors' opinions and criticisms with humility and awe. With the right mindset to face **writing, I believe that students will be able to successfully complete ** and be recognized and supported by their tutors.
This article mainly discusses the delicate relationship between teachers and students, the path that students need to revise and improve repeatedly, and the right mindset to approach writing. The interaction between faculty and students is important in the academic research process, and students need to be able to accept criticism and guidance from their supervisors and actively strive to improve their own writing. At the same time, students also need to maintain the right mindset, cherish the opportunity to write, and see the suggestions and opinions of their tutors as an opportunity to improve themselves. Through proper communication and interaction, faculty and students can establish a good cooperative relationship and jointly achieve the goals of academic research.