First of all, it should be, not a casual definition of "doctor".
Author丨Finance.
Production丨Finance one by one.
The more new things on the Internet, the stronger the atmosphere of eating melons. In the ** circle, a few days ago, a big man wailed that his revenue was bleak, and then there was news that a well-known ** and a public figure were "on the bar".
As a curious person who is keen on eating melons, he soon found out that this was "an online matter" that happened between 36 Krypton and Sun Yuchen - 36 Krypton had previously written an interview with Sun Yuchen's character, but the article then attracted huge attention, some people were scolding Sun Yuchen at the same time, others were also questioning whether the article's wording, logic, position, etc. were appropriate.
The reason for this turned out to be that 36 Krypton officially released more than 10,000 text articlesIt uses a lot of cobbled together rumors, unsubstantiated materials, and speculations that are not based on facts, and also deducted one "hat" after another for Sun Yuchen.
Regarding the practice of 36 Krypton articles, Sun Yuchen rarely publicly said that he "doesn't care".
Although Sun Yuchen doesn't care, this article is still circulating in the circle, and some of the controversial untrue facts and common sense errors in some articles have also become the focus of everyone's analysis and attention.
In order to aggravate the "condition", the "coconut chicken" joke was created
In the sprinkling article produced by 36 Krypton, when the reporter and Sun Yuchen met for an exclusive interview, Sun Yuchen did not reply to the message in time.
This was originally considered a heinous crime in the eyes of many people, but it caused a huge aftermath in this article - the article felt that Sun Yuchen's failure to reply to the message was "the completion of a classic 'escape show'".
Moreover, Sun Yuchen, who "escaped", was also interpreted as a "patient" who "played in various crazy ways" because he thought that among the people who scolded him, "many of them were people who didn't make money from him".
So, the article gives him a "patient" label straight from the title.
At first glance, I thought Sun Yuchen was sick, but after reading the whole article, I found that Sun Yuchen was not sick, but some people hoped that he was a "patient".
This is also the first point of controversy caused by this article - it is difficult for many people to understand that a well-known and influential ** would actually use such purely subjective and obviously biased words to refer to a person.
In normal facts and logic, as the "uncrowned king", neutrality and objectivity should be the first criterion of ethics, but in this article, Sun Yuchen was called a "patient" by the other party because he did not reply to the message in time, so it sparked heated discussions.
This is also the first time many people see this title, they feel shocked.
But this is not the most serious, the way this article is written later can be called truly miserable.
Because Sun Yuchen was labeled as a "patient" because he didn't reply to the message in time, it was far from enough, and he had to be labeled with a heavier label.
For the sake of this label, this article then called Sun Yuchen "easy to suffer from mental illness", and now, from "patient" to "plagued by mental illness", is it very smooth?
People who don't know what is going on will probably think that the author of the article is Sun Yuchen's doctor, or the attending doctor who accompanied Sun Yuchen all the way to the development of his condition.
However, does this end of the matter?
No, it won't. Can Sun Yuchen's "diagnosis" end so easily?In addition to constantly escalating his "condition", do you also want to sort out the harm to society for him?
Therefore, in the following tone of this article, Sun Yuchen's "illness" was confirmed with an extremely serious harmful consequence.
What are the consequences of this?
Let's just quote the original article :"Because of his presence, some bad tendencies are speeding away—greed, selfishness, fear, and fame-seeking. ”
This may be the one thing Sun regrets the most - just because he didn't reply to the message, he ended up with a crime of "accelerating greed, selfishness, fear, and fame and fame".
However, Sun Yuchen should be glad that after all, this article did not put the blame for global warming, the greenhouse effect, and the deterioration of the ecological environment on him.
If this way of operation is still the best way to express likes and dislikes, then the next few ways may make people's jaws drop.
For example, this article gives an example of Sun Yuchen eating coconut chicken with others, and the details described in the article are Sun Yuchen"Scoop most of the chicken into your own bowl at once."At first glance, this sentence is too vivid, and one sentence shows Sun Yuchen's selfish, greedy, and mercenary labels vividly.
However, in order to describe it vividly, do you ignore basic common sense?
According to the cooking recipes on the web,The coconut chicken dish needs to be chopped into small pieces when making it, and the finished coconut chicken dish is not a whole chicken, so how did Sun Yuchen manage to "scoop most of the chicken into his bowl at one time"?
I don't know if this ** has never eaten coconut chicken, or this** can't tell the difference between coconut chicken and other chicken dishes?
Just search for it, it's not that hard, right?
Although it is very understandable that the article is very urgent to highlight Sun Yuchen's selfishness, greed, and mercenary, but ignoring the basic facts, he picks up the pen and writes nonsense, what kind of writing style is this?
Words are a force, but they can also have a backlash. Writing for the sake of writing, regardless of the basic factual basis, can easily backfire on the standard of the article.
There are no interviews, but there are one-sided interviews and speculations
Labeling Sun Yuchen with the passage of eating coconut chicken is just one of the ways this article operates.
Although there are very obvious flaws in this episode, at least a so-called "Sun Yuchen's ex-girlfriend" was found as the source of the story.
But in the various episodes collected later, this article didn't even bother to find the source of the material, and all the interviewees were "old acquaintances", "insiders", "very close people", "a TRON employee", and "a "spokesperson" for an entrepreneur who has close personal relations with many bigwigs in the currency circle.
As for how many of these "spokespersons" are real and how many are fictitious, only the author of the article can know.
*In order to protect the privacy of the interviewee, the real name of the interviewee is usually not mentioned in the article, which is a common practice in the industry, and this practice is not without inappropriateness.
However, in order to protect the privacy of the interviewees, some "spokespersons" are at their fingertips, and the authenticity and credibility of such a situation are also questionable.
Because the opinions of these interviewees are surprisingly consistent, their evaluations of Sun Yuchen are all hostile and negative - there is really no other reasonable explanation for this situation than the deliberate selection of interviewees.
Cross-verification, multi-party interviews, and is no longer the basic requirement of the industry
And, this oneAlthough the article is an interview with a character, at the beginning of the article, in addition to the "criminal evidence" that Sun Yuchen did not reply to the information in time, the "criminal evidence" is written latersection, there is no content of any reporter's interview with Sun Yuchen.
There are only one-sided words from myself and other interviewees, but there is no interview with the reporter and Sun Yuchen, is this an exclusive interview?
But that's not the best part of the article, because in the rest of the article, hearsay and subjective speculation began to become another novel way to write the article.
When the article describes Sun Yuchen's study at Peking University, he writes about Sun Yuchen's various alternative actions and outrageous behaviors, but these "cases" have neither a clear source nor a precise source, and all the conclusions are all the same "Sun Yuchen is sick".
For example, "there, he put away his 'weak' side and began to show a 'sickly' smile" and other descriptions, almost all of which are repeated statements, and the conclusions are all "diagnostic results" issued by the article itself.
Even, the more surprising place is here-This ** even bluntly stated in the article that "an unverified detail"., capitalize and close-up the "unconfirmed" rumors as material, what kind of genre of ** writing technique is this?
The current ** ethics and moral bottom line have been reduced to the point of writing all kinds of unreliable rumors, rumors, and jokes into regular articles?
In other aspects, the chaotic stacking of collected bridges, the lack of timeline in the narrative process, and the lack of connection and logic between the contexts are considered to be problems at the level of writing, so I will not discuss them here.
I thought it would be surprising to be careless and not rigorous in making content, but in the end, I didn't expect this article to be usableTurning black and white upside down and distorting factsThe mind to write.
In the article, it was written that Sun Yuchen was not exhausted in luxury, did not pursue "customized yachts, luxury houses, and top luxury cars studded with diamonds", rarely participated in "drunken gold fans, yacht parties", and did not overeat in order to maintain his figure, and only ate simple vegetable salads and other living habitsHe was labeled as "someone who is powerless to struggle and no longer cares".
It's ......What kind of brain circuitry does it have to be to come to such a conclusion?
A person is not poor in luxury, does not pursue "customized yachts, luxury houses, and top luxury cars studded with diamonds", does not participate in "drunken gold fans, yacht parties", and does not overeat in order to manage his figureIt's actually wrong?
What kind of values do you have to be to come to such a conclusion?
I'm afraid that Zhao Gao's reincarnation more than 2,000 years ago will also be ashamed.
Otherwise, how can we explain the conclusion that "all kinds of substances that are contrary to warmth, innovation, justice, and tolerance go deep into the skin and blood along the intestines, and may eventually spread throughout the body"?
Bad is bad, good must also be bad, everything can only be bad, this is probably the current writing values and platform logic, and only such values and logic can explain a series of unbelievable three views.
Returning to the benign direction, there is a long way to go
It should be noted that Sun Yuchen is not a perfect person, he has many shortcomings, this is a fact.
* It is no problem to supervise him and criticize him within a reasonable scope.
But there needs to be a "degree" boundary, that is, the bottom line within the scope of legal norms and professional ethics.
You can write that he is not good, you can criticize him, but you can't frame him and distort black and white. This is the most basic bottom line of the well-known **.
If, in order to satisfy selfish desires, you cross the basic bottom line, then you lose your basic professional ethics and become a wicked person who uses the pen as a knife.
Judging from the wording, sentences, metaphors, hearsay, speculation, and various paragraphs, stories, materials and other elements that cannot be verified in this article, as well as the style of writingIt's hard to imagine what kind of hatred and hatred happened between Sun Yuchen and **So much so that every word in the article is full of the label of "sickness" for his perseverance.
You must know that just over a year ago, Sun Yuchen also participated in this summit hosted by ** and delivered a speech, at that time, Sun Yuchen and this ** knew everything about wine, but only a year later, Sun Yuchen did not participate in this **summit again, and this ** immediately launched such a well-made article.
What happened in the meantime?
Although there are many cases of "sweet first, goodbye" in the industry, most of the manuscripts are still based on facts to criticize the "predecessor", but this ** writes about Sun Yuchen with words that are almost personal attacks, and this mentality is really rare in the industry.
If the business is not successful, benevolence and righteousness are still there, and if you don't cooperate anymore, you can at least be a passerby. But if you don't cooperate, you have to put the other party to death, what kind of deep hatred does this have?
If you act recklessly and use the power of the pen in your hand without restraint, then it is easy to be eaten by yourself without the supervision of standards and guidelines.
The current capital market already has the answer - there is a market value of hundreds of millions of dollars in the early days of listing to tens of millions of dollars in the current market value, and the downward stock price trend is not just a good illustration?
* The development of the industry also needs a benign directionReturning to the height of content and driving oneself and the industry to be benign should become the best values.
Otherwise, in the Internet circle where eating melons is fun every day, while eating other people's melons every day, he also makes himself the object of eating melons on the Internet, so why bother?
* Eating someone else's melon is not guilty, butEating phaseIt could have been a little better, otherwise, when you are eaten by others, it means that the industry has embarked on a road of no return.
So, whenWhen the big guy feels that the industry is getting bleaker, shouldn't he also reflect on the reasons?
After all, "no snowflake is innocent in an avalanche".
end / —