Chen Yuan, a native of Wuxi, Jiangsu, is one of the main members of the modern criticism school. There were frequent confrontations with Lu Xun and many polemics. Modern Review was the main platform for him to publish his criticism of Lu Xun and became the focus of the dispute between Lu Xun and the modern critics.
1. The debate on the great trend of female teachers.
The duel between Chen Yuan and Lu Xun stems from the stance on the trend of female teachers. Lu Xun sided with the students and criticized the school, while Chen Yuan published an article in the Modern Criticism as early as 1925 accusing him of trying to downplay student participation, implying that someone was manipulating behind the scenes.
In Chen Yuan's article, he likened the trend of female teachers to a "stinky latrine", which clearly shows his tendency. In Lu Xun's counterattack against Chen Yuan, he revealed Chen Yuan's hypocrisy by ridiculing his origin and lineage. This debate is not only about positions, but also about the complexity of political leanings.
2. Lu Xun's "plagiarism case".
From the end of 1925 to the beginning of 1926, Chen Yuan fell in love with the writer Ling Shuhua, but Ling Shuhua was involved in the "plagiarism" turmoil. Chen Yuan exonerated her in the Modern Review, justifying plagiarism as a common emotion, and even alluding to plagiarism as a legitimate behavior of great writers.
In this context, Chen Yuan pointed the finger at Lu Xun, claiming that his "History of China" was a copy of Yangu Wen. Lu Xun clarified the facts and accused Chen Yuan of deliberately distorting them. Chen Yuan's arguments became more and more extreme, trying to draw attention to Lu Xun and confuse right and wrong.
Reflection and summary.
Chen Yuan's behavior not only failed to prove Lu Xun's plagiarism, but instead made Lu Xun bear ten years of grievances. This kind of radical counterattack is not to clarify the facts, but to defend the position of Chen Yuan and Ling Shuhua. Behind the controversy lies complex factors of politics, stance, and emotion, which makes the whole turmoil full of confusion and controversy.
New title: Lu Xun vs Chen Yuan: The Position Struggle of Literary Giants, Dissecting the Truth of the "Plagiarism" Turmoil!
In this essay on the literary controversy between Lu Xun and Chen Yuan, we get a glimpse into the ideological struggles and complex relationships in the Chinese literary world in the early 20th century. This controversy involves not only academic contentions, but also multiple factors such as politics, stance, and personal feelings, presenting a rich and intricate literary situation.
First, the controversy sparked by the Female Teacher Movement highlighted the differences among Chinese intellectuals on social change at the time. Lu Xun stood on the side of the students, criticized the school, and advocated confrontation with injustice. Chen Yuan, on the other hand, is critical of ***, trying to downplay student participation, emphasizing that there are people behind it. This reflects the diversity of attitudes towards social change among members of the modern critics at the time, ranging from those who supported the revolution to those who were skeptical of the Communist Party.
Second, the controversy over "plagiarism" shows Chen Yuan's attack on Lu Xun. Chen Yuan tried to exonerate Ling Shuhua by accusing Lu Xun of plagiarizing the views of Ling Shuhua and Shiotani Wen. This not only reflects Chen Yuan's support for Ling Shuhua, but also an attack on Lu Xun's academic prestige. The controversy revealed the fierce rivalry and personal feuds in the literary field of the time, and the scholars not only clashed academically, but also fiercely clashed over political positions and emotions.
In the article, Chen Yuan's argument presents an extreme bias, trying to defend his position by attacking Lu Xun. However, this technique did not succeed and put himself in an embarrassing position. Through detailed justification, Lu Xun clarified his reference in "A Brief History of China" and accused Chen Yuan of hypocrisy. This has caused Chen Yuan to lose some credibility in the eyes of readers and academics.
This controversy reflected not only the competition between individuals, but also the diversity of thought and the intensity of debate in the Chinese intellectual circles at that time. As a member of the modern criticism school, Chen Yuan represented the hesitation and concern of some intellectuals at that time about social change. However, his extreme and aggressive approach makes his polemics somewhat pale.
Taken together, this essay paints a picture of the Chinese literary scene in the early 20th century. In the interweaving of ideas, politics and emotions, intellectuals launched a fierce debate, and the influence of this controversy not only stayed at the time, but also profoundly affected the development of Chinese literary thought.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!