You got it?
There have been some minor changes in the access control system of Peking University, teachers do not need to brush their faces when driving into and walking out of the school, but facial recognition is still required to walk into the school.
Isn't that a little surprising to you?While this change is generally progressive, some people think that it is still not satisfactory.
He stressed that rights need to be fought for, and that there should be no unconditional cooperation, and that silence and concession will not bring peace.
So, how much of an impact does this change have?Let's take a look.
It is understood that the change of the access control system of Peking University has attracted a lot of attention.
Some people see this as a positive change, while others think it's not radical enough.
While this change is generally progressive, facial recognition is still required to walk into the campus, which violates the rights of alumni.
In particular, the "appointment" system allows power to need.
It is even more dissatisfying that it can only be enjoyed after approval.
Of course, there are also people who have a different view of this change. Some believe that this change is a positive signal and an opportunity to promote the improvement of the rules.
However, embarrassment may be an opportunity to promote the improvement of the rules, but opposing unconditional cooperation is the right attitude. Silence and concession do not bring tranquility, but rather limit the freedom of the individual, and the rights need special permission.
So, how much of an impact does this change have?Through their personal experiences, students reflected on the infringement of alumni rights by the Peking University access control system, especially the reservation system.
The students felt deprived and expressed their dissatisfaction with the access control system.
This change is small, but it has attracted a lot of attention.
We hope that Peking University will remain a symbol of freedom, openness, and inclusiveness, rather than a closed door.
The importance of this event is self-evident, and we should actively participate in the discussion and leave our own opinions. Thank you.
Learn more about the letter.