The group that crusaded against Zhang Xuefeng said that he was instilling refined egoism in society

Zhang Xuefeng was attacked because he was telling the truth

Those who supported him thought that he was telling the truth and his conscience.

His critics think that his professional judgment and employment guidance are too utilitarian and short-sighted, and arbitrarily deny the "uselessness" of the major.

Some netizens said,

The people who went to consult him were all middle school and below students, and they were studying to find a good career in the future.

As for the construction of the motherland and the revitalization of China, there are excellent students to complete it, and these students generally do not consult him, because others can go wherever they want, and the places they go are not bad, they are all top universities.

Although the advice he gave didn't sound so lofty, and he wouldn't have the same mind as "reading for the rise of the nation", it was very down-to-earth.

Many parents work so hard to provide for a college student, just hoping that they can live well, even if they can't get a job, they must have a good future.

If you are unemployed after graduation, why do you spend so much energy?

Of course, no matter what major you choose, you still have to rely on yourself to complete it in the end.

A good profession is not the same as sitting back and enjoying it.

If the students can go one step further and elevate their original families to a higher position, this is also what their parents want to see.

As for those who criticize Zhang Xuefeng's remarks, they are not so-called vested interests.

They are more from the perspective of criticizing refined egoism and utilitarianism.

In those years, such a phenomenon occurred in the self-defense and counterattack war, and many soldiers' family members believed that they had to run and fight hard if they had a good job.

even ridiculed those who came back, thinking that they were stupid and had no ability to make wedding clothes for others, because they were unclear and were fooled.

Some people are indeed under the influence of utilitarianism and begin to doubt their choices.

Everybody is smart. But can you say that those groups who want to make a lot of money are wrong?But is it right to just want to make a lot of money?

In the long run, Zhang Xuefeng's suggestion is misleading, but in reality, he is making up for the lack of employment information.

What he really has value is the lack of information about his major and school admissions.

This information is something that can only be known by insiders through years of accumulation, and it is easy to tell the public.

Many people get good scores, but because of professional problems or the wrong direction of the school, many students work in vain and make wedding dresses for others.

No one wants to learn Xi dragon slayer.

However, when information is transparent, there is no longer a choice advantage, and it goes back to square one.

He combines different groups and family conditions to give him the best choice.

Even if he thinks that a certain major is good for employment, it does not mean that everyone has the conditions and scores to choose.

For example, some netizens said:

His advice is based on the student's location, family background, and test scores, and is not suitable for everyone.

Many of the people who sprayed him were obedient and listened to half of it, just like a journalism major, and he said that the premise was that the student could choose a major at any time in a school outside of Qingbei, but the people who sprayed him were all staring at the second half of the sentence.

The relationship between what the major is and what the career college students will engage in in the future is not as big as imagined.