I have seen a lot of bizarre regulations in Chinese education, but this time I was really shocked, because I really broke through my imagination this time.
I also suddenly understood why school teachers had so many bizarre tasks.
It also understands why so many ** departments are willing to use the school's students to promote the implementation of a certain program. Because it is difficult to get a person to do something, but to push it through his children, no matter how difficult it is, may be easily solved. For example, donating blood, such as donations.
Recently, public primary schools in Wuyi County, Zhejiang Province, implemented a controversial merit-based admission policy to determine the admission qualifications of new citizens' children based on their parents' scores. What has attracted more social attention is that parents can increase their points by participating in unpaid blood donation activities or donating, which has caused widespread discussion and controversy. This policy raises questions about fairness, with some seeing it as a way to encourage social good, while others are concerned that it could lead to unfair outcomes.
According to the specific content of the policy, parents can get 2 points for every 100ml of blood donation, 8 points for a maximum of 400ml of blood, and 2 points for every 1,000 yuan donated to charities in the county, up to a maximum of 20 points. These points will be used as an important basis for admission, and families with high scores will have a greater chance of getting their children admitted to public primary schools. However, the fairness of this policy has been questioned because it seems to give more admission to families who can afford to donate blood or donate, which may have some inequality compared to children from poor families.
The staff of the Wuyi County Education Bureau made it clear that the county has indeed adopted a points-based enrollment policy, and the school will select the best according to the parents' points from high to low. Such policies have encouraged parents to participate in social welfare activities to a certain extent, such as blood donation and donations, but it has also aroused concern and controversy from all walks of life. Some believe that such policies can help promote social good and also improve the sense of integration of new citizen families into the community. However, on the other hand, some have questioned the fairness of this policy, fearing that it could lead to unfair admissions based on financial ability rather than individual student ability.
In dealing with this issue, the relevant departments should take the concerns and controversies of the society seriously and further improve the points-based admission policy. First of all, it is necessary to clarify the purpose of the policy, and clarify whether the original intention of the policy is to promote social good or simply to solve the problem of school admission. Second, the specific implementation rules of the policy need to be more reasonable and fair to avoid possible unfairness. While encouraging social good, it is also necessary to ensure that all students have equal access to education.
In general, it is hoped that the relevant departments can more carefully consider the interests of all parties in the subsequent policy formulation and implementation process, ensure the fairness and justice of the policy, and let every child have an equal opportunity to receive high-quality education. Social consensus and support are the key to the success of the policy, and through full discussion and reflection, I believe that a more scientific and reasonable admission policy can be found.
Mingren don't say secret words, you've read it, you can not like it, don't pay attention to it, but please recommend it, **, thank you!
I am a university teacher, and I am very willing to share this topic with you. **From the Internet, infringement notice. This article is original and any form of infringement is prohibited.