Writing is a technical job, which is like a nonsense, even elementary school students who have just learned to write essays know it. However, knowing is knowing, and it is not easy to do.
There is a story about the famous poet Mr. Liu Yazi attending the meeting, and the original speech was not used, but he digressed from the topic to talk about other issues, and the conversation lasted for an hour, as if he was in class.
This is a common fault of poets and writers. Originally, I thought it was very good, but here it is brief, and there is an important thing to say, but as soon as I opened my mouth and started writing, I talked endlessly. In the end, the manuscript that was originally intended to be written for 800 words was written for 3,000 words. You can't say that he doesn't write well, it's just a little wordy.
A well-known writer can write freely when he writes his own manuscript, and he can write whatever he wants. Because he has become a benchmark, he is right to write anything. He writes so verbosely, you could say he's delicate;He has few words, you can say concise and concise.
But for a newbie, how you write can be wrong. Because what you think and what others think may be completely different. Where others think it should be delicate, you are concise;Where others think it should be concise, you are delicate. In fact, everything can be concise and delicate, but when and how to deal with it is another matter.
That's the trick.
This technique has to do with the reader's aesthetic inclinations. To put it simply, what is popular in society and what others want to know, you have to write clearly and delicately;If others don't want to know, just write it off. Take the adaptation of "The Legend of Deer and Ding" as an example, from Andy Lau to Chen Xiaochun, to Zhang Weijian, Stephen Chow and several films made in recent years, in fact, each one has highlights, and each one has highlights, but different people appreciate it from different angles. That said, the first skill in writing is to know who to write for and what others like to read. It's easy to say, but it's not so easy to understand.
In the specific operation process, many people often follow the trend. You must know that a word, a detailed description, is related to style. Different styles correspond to different readers, and a one-word difference may cause readers to lose.
That is to say, although we know that skill is important, we tend to forget it. In many cases, the technique is not the control of the so-called modulation and frustration of various aspects, but the rational use of a word, a word, and a sentence.
Another example is writing prose, borrowing scenes to express lyricism. The scene is just a little bit, but the feelings are expressed a lot, and finally they all turn into complaints. In the process of writing, everything can be controlled just right in order to write a beautiful article. Sometimes we wonder: others write that the sky is high and the clouds are classics, but I write the sky is high and the clouds are nonsense. Yes, the same word, the same sentence, will have different effects when it appears in different scenarios.
Or Mr. Yang Jiang said it well: many times we think too much, but we read too little.
It may not be entirely true to say that there is too little reading now, after all, many people nowadays do read a lot of books. However, the vast majority of people have too many theories and too few specific literary works. Some people read literature with a critical eye, rather than an immersive appreciation. There is no gain in reading this way.
At the end of the day, we know that writing is a technical job, but when we write, we are always stubborn about what we want to writeWhen I write, I always digress from the topic, forgetting the use of skills, and only thinking about expressing my feelings;Or, when it is written, it is just immersed in its own story, unable to extricate itself.
The technique is not profound, the key is to be able to use it. I can really remember the skills at any time, and the skills of use without leaking traces, there is nothing bad about the article.