Judging from the situation in recent years, almost all applications in Korea are non-materialCultureThe heritage items were all moved from China, some with slight embellishments, and some were completely copied from the original, which made Chinese netizens very angry and directly gave South Korea the nickname "stealing the country". However, at the end of 2022, when the South Korean application will be ".Fireworks"Listed as immaterialCultureAfter the news of the inheritance came out, it was surprising that the attitude of Chinese netizens changed 360 degrees, and they left a message in the comment area: "We don't want it anymore, don't you allow others to apply?".Such a reaction is surprising, but it is actually the Chinese themselvesCultureThe traditional self-confidence and self-improvement mentality is manifesting.
However, given the fact that South Korea has a negative response to ChinaCultureConductedInscriptionIn fact, there are still some emotional contradictions and resistance among Chinese netizens. For their ownCultureHeritage is constantly being applied for as intangible cultural heritage items by other countries, which makes it emotionally unacceptable to Chinese because of theseCultureThe inheritance represents their identity and the treasure of the family, how can it easily become someone else's?In this regard, the sentiment of Chinese netizens is understandable, but it is also necessary to look at this issue calmly. After all, UNESCO allows multiple regions to apply for the same intangible cultural heritage item, and to protect and pass it onCultureis more important.
However, for KoreanCultureInscriptionbehavior, many Chinese netizens still have a critical attitude. Over the past few years, South Korea has been on several occasionsInscriptionChina's traditional festivals and food, which has made many Chinese netizens feel dissatisfied and angry. For example, in 2019, South Korean netizens called for GuangxiLiuzhouofSnail flourThe application is immaterialCulturelegacy, which gave rise to GuangxiLiuzhoupeople's strong dissatisfaction. They believe that GuangxiLiuzhouofSnail flourIt's completely different from Korean food, how can it beKoreansWhat about applying for intangible cultural heritage?The reason why Korean netizens applied for intangible cultural heritage of such food is largely because of their love for food, but this behavior has caused dissatisfaction and boycott from Chinese netizens.
However, South KoreaInscriptionChinaCultureThe act has also triggered a reflection on China's own intangible cultural heritage protection. In recent years, young Chinese have gradually distanced themselves from traditionCultureand festivals, to the WestCultureMore familiar. In this case, South Korea snatches ChinaCultureInstead, young Chinese are starting to re-value their traditionsCulture。It can be said that KoreanInscriptionThe behavior served as a warning to some extent, reawakening the Chinese to traditionCultureThe importance of starting on their ownCultureThere is more attention and protection for heritage.
In general, South KoreaInscriptionChineseCultureLegacy has always been dissatisfied with Chinese netizens, but when South KoreaInscriptionFireworks"When this project was made, the attitude of Chinese netizens changed. This is mainly because of the pairFireworksProhibition of dissatisfaction,FireworksIt is an important part of the traditional Chinese New Year festival, but in recent years due to safety and environmental considerationsFireworksThe ban regulations are becoming more and more stringent, making people feel that the Chinese New Year has lost some of its flavor. This time South KoreaInscriptionFireworksproject, so that Chinese netizens realizedFireworksThe importance of this, in support of this.
However, for South KoreaInscriptionChinaCulturePeople still generally hold a critical and resistant attitude. Many Chinese netizens believe that the intangible cultural heritage items applied by South Korea are often traditional to ChinaCulturePlagiarism and plagiarism make people feel angry and dissatisfied. AlthoughKoreansForInscriptionThe principle is more pertinent, acknowledging that these projects are ChinaCultureAfter the introduction to Korea, they developed and evolved, but their behavior is still unacceptable.
On the other hand, China itself has its own traditionsCultureof the problem of insufficient protection. In recent years, many traditional Xi have gradually been forgotten by young people, and more attention has been paid to the WestCultureand festivals. Against this background, South Korea snatched ChinaCultureInstead, it has made young Chinese re-value their traditionsCulture, which is also noteworthy and reflective.
However, both KoreanInscriptionChinaCultureOr is it China's own tradition of itCultureIt is necessary to maintain a calm and objective attitude on the issue of protection. It is a principle of impartiality and fairness that UNESCO allows multiple regions to apply for the same intangible cultural heritage item. It's important to really value your own traditionsCultureto inherit and protect your ownCultureheritage, but also to be more open and inclusive to other countries forCultureinheritance and development. It is only on the basis of mutual respect and cooperation that we can work together to advance the worldCultureDiversity flourishes and grows.