Jia Pingwa's "Waste Capital", is it a wonderful flower in the literary world, or a victim of being misunderstood by the Internet?It's a topic that's always been debated. As an influential **, "Waste Capital" not only reflects the confusion of intellectuals in the market economy, but also embodies the highest level of Jia Pingwa in literature. But why is "Waste Capital" criticized on the Internet?In fact, there are two main reasons for this: following the trend evaluation and not understanding the evaluation of the work. People who follow the trend of evaluation like to belittle "The Waste Capital" at will, without rigorous argumentation and in-depth reading. And those who really know Jia Pingwa and read his works in depth will not easily deny the value of "Waste Capital". As Ji Xianlin said, this is a "shining in 20 years", and it will eventually become a classic.
We should evaluate literary works objectively, rather than blindly following trends. "Waste Capital": A time witness, Jia Pingwa's "Waste Capital" once caused an uproar in the literary world and was fiercely criticized by experts and scholars. However, over time, "Waste Capital" has gradually become a cultural phenomenon with historical value. It is not only praised by cultural celebrities such as Ji Xianlin and Mo Yan, but also recognized by more and more people. So, why is this happening?Is it because the value of "Waste Capital" itself is misunderstood by everyone?In fact, as a ** film with ruins as the background, "Waste Capital" fully expresses Jia Pingwa's deep thinking about the era in which it is located when it is created.
*By telling the life of the residents of the ruined capital, it depicts a world covered in ruins, thus raising people's questions about human nature, life, love, etc. As Mo Yan said, "The Waste City must be a work that will be often discussed in the past, present and future in the Chinese literary circles, and it is an important work in the history of contemporary Chinese literature." The experts who criticized it back then have also changed their views. Today, "Waste Capital" has become a witness of time, which witnesses not only the evolution of literature, but also the changes of society and human nature. From being questioned to being recognized by more and more people, all of this is forged by time. It is precisely because of this that we should go deeper into the work itself, rather than looking at it one-sidedly.
Only in this way can we discover the profound connotation of human nature, life, love and other issues contained in Jia Pingwa and his "Waste Capital", and can we truly appreciate the historical value of this **. Therefore, perhaps we should think deeply about the question: do we really understand the value of this era?