The tutor's reaction after reading ** made many college students smile bitterly. In the eyes of the mentors, these "elites" who have been screened out make them feel at a loss. During their time at university, students mainly learn Xi theoretical knowledge and do not involve the level of "academic research". Therefore, it is only when they enter the graduate stage that they realize the importance of ** and experimentation, which has a serious impact on their future. For inexperienced college students, writing ** often requires multiple revisions, and the guidance of a tutor is essential. However, from the mentor's point of view, they may face a "big surprise" situation or even be speechless.
What made the tutors laugh and cry was that many of the students' language skills were "surprising". One student actually used the word "as his own" to express his concern and help to his mentor. This left even the young, open-minded teachers speechless: I'm only 27 years old;And the meaning of this word is to describe stepmothers and stepfathers who are good to their stepson, which is completely inapplicable to the relationship between tutors and students. The tutors were surprised by the level of contemporary graduate students: "How did you get in?" This is just one of the more immediate reactions. When they get used Xi the level of this generation of students, they begin to laugh at themselves and turn around and curse. Mentors may ask students, "Do you have any other plans for graduation?"In fact, they are referring to this ** There is still a big gap from qualification, and whether there is a plan to graduate normally seems perfunctory. What's even more helpless is that many students are not perfunctory, their abilities are like this. The tutors struggled with how to revise it, because it was basically a new one. Some of them commented: "You write like a Dream of Red Mansions", implying that the students' ** is full of absurd words, just like the famous words in "A Dream of Red Mansions". Some tutors will even ask students, "Are you an academician?"Although it is a compliment on the surface, it is actually saying that the students are talking nonsense, and the intention of making up the word count is too obvious. What's even more desperate is that "please remove my name from the acknowledgments", which means that the tutor has completely given up on helping the students.
A good ** must first meet the requirements of higher education, including topic selection, word count, framework, etc. Although graduate students have limited ability to innovate, the word count requirement is very high. This leads to many students having to add some paragraphs that "make up the word count" when writing **. This also makes the tutors feel that the lack of seriousness and gold content is too low. In addition, some science and engineering students may not have been exposed to language training for a long time, resulting in inaccurate use of words, serious colloquialism, and frequent misuse. Therefore, to satisfy the tutor, the student needs to ensure that the vocabulary and sentences in the ** are used in a standard manner, maintaining a formal, urbane tone, and at the same time improving the professionalism of the research topic.
However, many people think that the excessive pursuit of the number of words or the number of ** is not necessarily an effective way to cultivate. If the gold content of ** is not improved, no matter how much you write, it is only a face-saving effort. Ensuring the number of words and the number of words is important, but pursuing these too much can lead to dogmatism and make students gradually lose their attention to authority. In addition, the phenomenon of "learning valves" in colleges and universities also needs to be concerned and limited. Sometimes, in order to gain recognition and resources in a particular specialty, the position of a mentor is extremely important. If academic evaluation is based only on qualifications rather than academic research itself, then it will be difficult for truly powerful teachers and students to stand out after forming a set of internal chains.
All in all, the tutor's reaction after reading ** is ridiculous. From their reactions, we can see that it is not easy to write a good **, and it requires students to work topic selection, professional knowledge, language expression, etc. However, excessive pursuit of word count and quantity is not an effective way to improve the quality of **. On the contrary, we should pay attention to the quality and professionalism of the content, and avoid dogmatism and unhealthy competition within the academic circle. Through in-depth thinking and continuous learning Xi, I hope we can write better and more academically valuable**.