Title:
"The smell of gunpowder" is full!The US-Israel relationship is changing, China is meddling, and the Middle East is a bit interesting!
In the hot land of the Middle East, a vigorous storm is quietly brewing. Israel's recklessness, on the one hand, and the United Nations' reluctance on the other, have plunged the international community into a political and moral confrontation. And behind all this, there is the wrestling between the two major powers, the United States and China, presenting a tense drama.
Situational introduction and question raising.
Suppose you are immersed in the waves of a world situation and see Israel behaving recklessly, causing displeasure in the international community. The United Nations, as a mediator in international affairs, finally lost its patience and waved the sword of "stopping". This begs me, how do we deal with this political storm?
Analysis of specific cases and problems.
Let's take a quick look back at the recent series of events. First, for the first time, the UN Secretary-General invoked the UN Charter to call on the Security Council to intervene in the situation in Gaza. It was a symbolic move that underscored the intolerance of international organizations for Israel's behavior. Subsequently, the United Nations convened an emergency meeting and adopted a resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. It may seem like a last resort, but there's more to it than meets the eye.
At the same time, differences between the United States and Israel are gradually emerging. Biden issued a rare "tough" warning to Israel on the campaign trail, accusing it of losing support due to "indiscriminate bombing." What is even more remarkable is that he made it clear that Israel **needs to change** and welcomes the "two-state solution". This statement immediately aroused the dissatisfaction of the Israeli side, and the ** people came out to fight back, believing that it was a betrayal of Israel.
The reason behind the incident**.
To understand all of this in greater depth, we might as well go back to the Oslo Accords. Israel's communications minister made it clear that Israel would not agree to a two-state solution, which was a rejection of the US proposal. This allows us to see that behind it may be Israel's dissatisfaction with the Oslo Accords and its rejection of the "two-state solution". All this has laid the groundwork for the "internal strife" between the United States and Israel.
Extended thinking with the opposite direction argument.
As the differences between the leaders of the United States and Israel deepened, so did the estrangement between them. This escalation of "infighting" has become an important element in this Middle East storm. As pointed out, differences have emerged between the United States and Israel on their attitudes toward the Palestinian-Israeli issue, and this has provided favorable conditions for the international community to intervene in the settlement of the issue. Because the United States has long connived at Israel, it has gained inches, and once the United States withdraws special support, Israel may return to its pre-liberation period overnight.
Implications for the intervention of the international community.
Given that the attitude of the United States has always been a key factor in shaping Middle East affairs, this disagreement makes the intervention of the international community all the more urgent. If the United States withdraws its special consideration for Israel, Israel will be isolated in the international political arena and its strength will be weakened in an instant. From the perspective of hype, the differences between the United States and Israel have obviously become the focus, otherwise they would have been hyped up so quickly
China's efforts and impact on international affairs.
The role of China, as well as other third-party countries, cannot be ignored in this process. China has made tremendous efforts to support a humanitarian ceasefire and call for a two-state solution. Without China's unwavering support and communication with the United States, perhaps the United States would not have softened its attitude so quickly. This is not only a sign that China's efforts are gradually working, but also because the United States needs to find a balance in the Middle East to avoid getting caught up in the contradictions.
Conclusions and prospects.
To sum up, the "internal strife" between the United States and Israel escalated in this incident, thus exerting a positive impact on the international community in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli issue. However, we cannot ignore the complications behind it, in particular Israel's insistence on the two-state solution. For Netanyahu, whether he follows the consensus of the international community will have a direct impact on the outcome of this storm. If they can cease fire immediately and negotiate a two-state solution, a less dignified outcome may be avoided. China's role in this crisis is undoubtedly positive, and it has also injected a positive energy into the resolution of the Middle East problem. This may be an opportunity for the international community to re-examine and resolve the Middle East issue.