The original text mentions that not long ago Argentina held ** elections, and the Argentines chosenJavierMilley, the liberal far-right. However, in less than half a month, the Argentines began to regret this choice. This seems to validate our previous **, that this decision is destined to bring tragedy to the Argentines.
Argentines have been suffering from the last few yearsEconomyTroubled, high unemployment, inflation and other problems continue to plague them. Therefore, before the ** elections, they were full of despair and anxiety about the future. However, they choseJavierMilley, I hope he can bring itEconomyof recovery andSocialstability. However, shortly after taking office, Millet did not carry out the reforms that the Argentines wanted, on the contraryEconomyThe situation has worsened. This made the Argentines very disappointed and angry, and they began to realize that their choice could be wrong.
The original article mentions that although Millae did not abolish the peso immediately after coming to power, due to the large-scale devaluation of the peso, Argentina'sEconomyTotal collapse. In addition, it is also reported that in addition to the original 11 states, the subsequent 13 provinces have also begun to fall into varying degrees of financial difficulties. SocialAt the level, Argentines no longer cheered for Milley's election, instead took to the streets and verbally attacked Milley.
After Millet took office, many people had high hopes that he would be able to change Argentina through reformsEconomyState. However, contrary to expectations, the depreciation of the peso caused prices to skyrocket in ArgentinaEconomyFurther deterioration. Under normal circumstances, prices of 50% to 100% are a huge source of distress for Argentines. For example, you can pay 5 yuan for a bowl of noodles in the morning and 10 yuan the next day. Even worse, according to **, the price ** may reach 100%, then the ** of a bowl of noodles may soar to 20 to 30 yuan. How can Argentines not be outraged by this situation of runaway prices, which is intolerable to the Argentines?
What's even more puzzling is that when Milley ** cut spending, he actually chose to cancel a series of subsidies, such as subsidies for civil water and electricity, subsidies from the National Electricity and Gas Regulatory Authority, and financial subsidies for difficult states. InSocialEconomyIn an already precarious situation, such a move is undoubtedly to add insult to injury, givingSocialBrings more pressure.
The original text mentions that Milley ** proposed a call called"Shock**"ofEconomypolicy, but ignored"Resurrection"External support required for the stage. ArgentineEconomyThe condition is already very bad, externalEconomyAssistance is indispensable. However, the reality is that Millet could not find countries that could support them, including the United States and Brazil.
Shock**"It is one proposed by Milley**Economypolicy, which is designed to be achieved through rapid and drastic reformsEconomyof resuscitation. However, such policies often require external support to achieve the desired results. toUSSRFor example, they've tried something similar over the past few decadesEconomyreforms, but ended up in a difficult situation. Because they are dependent on external aid, but in the end this aid does not come in the way promised, resulting inUSSREconomyGo to pieces. Now, Argentina is facing a similar dilemma. Milley wants to pass"Shock**"RevitalizeEconomy, but they did not find the right country willing to provide the assistance they needed.
Faced with a difficult situation, Milley began to try to ask for help from China. However, they pleaded with China and ArgentinaCurrency exchange, which may seem like a ridiculous decision. The peso has depreciated by 100%, why would China use it?InternationalPurchasing powerRMBin exchange for ArgentinaOrdinary peopleWhat about worthless pesos?In addition, Milai also put forward a huge figure and hoped that China would provide 46.5 billion in aid. This is undoubtedly an unreasonable demand for China, and it also shows that Milley is unrealistic and irresponsible.
The original article mentions that Millais has recently begun to reform the limits on the power of the army, allowing the army to participate in the capture of the army. This move is believed to be to prevent others from imitating the line that Milley took to power, and it is maintainedSocialstability.
In order to ensure their dominance and maintenanceSocialMilley is trying to consolidate his position through a series of power transition initiatives. One of these initiatives is to ease restrictions on the power of the military and allow the military to participate in the capture of the a**. However, there are different views on this move. On the one hand, supporters argue that this prevents others from following the line that Milley came to power and sustaining it through the intervention of the militarySocialstability. Critics, on the other hand, fear that this will lead to abuse of power by the military, givingSocialBring even greater turmoil.
Great leaders bring hope and progress, while bad leaders bring hardships and regrets. The Argentine chose Millet and hopefully he will be able to bringEconomyof recovery andSocialstability. However, it wasn't long before they discovered that Milley's promise was just empty words of wishful thinking. Prices are skyrocketingEconomyThe collapse of the as wellSocialThe turmoil left Argentines regretting their choice. And this regret may not stop in the short term, and the next four years may continue to face difficulties and regrets.
This story teaches us that election choices are not made lightly and need to be carefully considered. Policy and leadership are critical to a country's development. InEconomyIn times of high risk, it is even more important to choose leaders carefully and not to believe in false promises.
In addition, this story also reminds us to be wary of those who claim to be able to pass"Shock**"Rapid implementationEconomyPolicies for recovery. Such policies often require external support and reasonable path planning, otherwise they may lead toEconomyof the bigger crash.
Finally, this story also serves as a warning not to pass on stress and difficulties to other countries. InternationalAid is a mutually beneficial act that should be based on mutual respect and cooperation. A country should assume its own responsibilities and not rely on other countries for unlimited assistance.
In general, the story of Argentina *** shows us that politics andEconomyThe intricacies of the intricate. For individuals, we need to pay more attention to and understand the importance of elections and ** to ensure that we make informed choices. For leaders and leaders, they should take responsibility for the development of the country and the well-being of the people, constantly improve and learn, and avoid abusing power for personal gain or backsliding. Only in this way can the prosperity of the country and the happiness of the people be realized.