The competition in the internal volume of the postgraduate entrance examination is fierce, and the admission may usher in two adjustments!
With the social demand for high education and the intensification of talent competition, examinations have become an important means for more and more people to improve their competitiveness.
However, the phenomenon of internal relocation of examinations is becoming more and more serious, and the pressure of competition has increased greatly, which has caused a huge psychological burden on candidates.
In view of this phenomenon, this paper analyzes and envisages two possible admissions policy adjustments, in order to provide some reference and suggestions for candidates.
The first is the diversification of admission criteria, and in the current competition for degrees, a single score criterion becomes the only goal pursued by candidates. However, this single admission criterion can no longer meet the diverse needs of society for talents. Therefore, the diversification of admission criteria has become an inevitable trend. Specifically, the future admission criteria may pay more attention to the comprehensive quality and practical ability of candidates. For example, for some majors, whether you have relevant internship experience, project experience, or special talents may be an important factor in admission.
In addition, some colleges and universities can also introduce an interview session to more comprehensively examine the comprehensive quality and adaptability of candidates. This diversification of enrollment standards is conducive to alleviating the phenomenon of examination absence, reducing the competitive pressure of candidates, and also facilitating the selection of the most suitable talents by colleges and universities.
For candidates, while focusing on grades, they should also pay attention to cultivating their comprehensive quality and practical ability to better adapt to future admission standards.
Second, increase the proportion of push-exempt students The push-exempt student system is an important part of China's graduate enrollment system, which aims to select outstanding talents with innovation potential and subject expertise.
However, in practice, there are certain limitations and problems in the promotion of eugenics. Therefore, increasing the proportion of students who are exempted from taking the examination has become another important way to alleviate the phenomenon of not taking the test. First of all, expanding the proportion of exempted students can reduce the competitive pressure of candidates. Due to the limited number of places for exempted students, many candidates can only get the opportunity to continue their studies through the examination.
If the proportion of students who are deferred from the examination is increased, more candidates will be exempted from the examination, thus reducing the competitive pressure on candidates. Secondly, the exemption system is conducive to the selection of outstanding talents with subject expertise and innovation potential. The assessment of the exempted students generally includes written examinations, interviews, comprehensive quality, etc., which can comprehensively examine the ability and quality of the candidates.
Therefore, the student promotion and promotion system can better select outstanding talents with subject expertise and innovation potential, so as to optimize the structure and quality of the graduate team. Finally, increasing the proportion of deferred students is also conducive to improving the autonomy of colleges and universities. Colleges and universities can independently determine enrollment plans and selection criteria according to their own discipline characteristics and enrollment needs.
This is conducive to the selection of the most suitable talents by colleges and universities and the improvement of the quality and level of postgraduate education. Of course, increasing the percentage of probationary students must also consider issues of fairness and transparency. Colleges and universities should formulate scientific and impartial evaluation standards and procedures for the promotion and promotion of students to ensure that the selection process is fair, just and open.
At the same time, the selection of exempt students should also focus on diversity and inclusion to avoid discrimination on the basis of geography and educational background.
In short: the phenomenon of internal friction in the examination is a common problem in today's society, which brings huge competitive pressure and psychological burden to candidates.
In order to solve this problem, this paper analyzes and proposes two possible adjustments to the admissions policy.
On the one hand, the enrollment criteria are diversified, focusing on the comprehensive quality and practical ability of applicantsOn the other hand, it is to expand the admission ratio, reduce the competitive pressure of applicants, and select outstanding talents with disciplinary advantages and innovation potential.
These adjustments will help alleviate the endoscopic phenomenon and improve the quality and level of graduate education. Needless to say, the specific adjustment measures must be thoroughly studied and studied in light of the actual situation.