Does Ukraine still want to be tough with Russia?
Originally, this answer was infinitely close to being negative, but as soon as Putin moved, the United States instantly responded to the pressure and gave us a positive answer with actions.
To avoid Putin's meddling in the Middle East, Ukraine can only prolong its wartime status.
However, it is easy to draw conclusions, and it is difficult to talk about the process. As we all know, Israel has restrained most of the energy of the United States, and it is a fantasy that the United States wants to use the scale it used to support Ukraine.
So what can be done? Fighting, it must be undoubted, how to get the support, Biden ** This time he put in a lot of effort, and even used two tricks in a row:
One: let Zelensky himself be a lobbyist and make a last stand for Ukraine.
This lobbyist is not easy to be, especially since NATO is already tired of the bottomless pit of Ukraine. As a supporting party, it is not appropriate to take into account the life and death of Ukraine when its own industrial capacity and economic strength are not good. What's more, Ukraine's opponent is still Russia.
To say that at the beginning, NATO still swore that dragging down Russia was just easy and a manifestation of self-confidence, but until now, although NATO does not admit it in its mouth, it also knows in its heart how fragile it is.
To put it nicely, they are military alliances, for the sake of ***, and if they don't say it well, they are just holding together to keep warm and concentrate on doing things.
Therefore, Zelensky this time not only has to kneel and lick the more than 60 billion dollars that Biden failed to pass, but also impress Europe's 50 billion euros. As for why it is said to be the "last stand", in fact, it is not difficult to understand, firstly, the ** inventory is even supported by the United States, and secondly, the conflict is still inevitable to negotiate in the end.
Second: poke at the hearts of European countries and use agitation to revive Europe.
What is the heart socket? That is, of course, the national military strength. The first industrial revolution began in Europe, which also gave them the crown of industry. The inferiority of military strength to others is due to the inadequacy of the country's economy and industry.
Interestingly, the US media directly criticized Europe for not being strong, and also took the opportunity to compare Europe with Asia, saying that in terms of military strength, Britain is far inferior to China, Russia and India, and France is inferior to South Korea, Japan, and Pakistan. In addition, there are also those who point out the shortcomings by name, such as: Germany's ammunition can only last two days, Denmark has no air defense system, etc.
A professor in the United Kingdom used one sentence to describe it, saying that "they are basically asleep".
Good guy, not to mention the heart, this trick is used to stimulate the law, and there is not even a fig leaf left for others. Co-authorship is a principle: it doesn't matter who the good guy is, the bad guy certainly won't be the United States anyway.
Looking at it this way, Biden's "two-pronged approach" is likely to be a bamboo basket for nothing.
First of all, Zelensky's days of stretching out his hands to eat and opening his mouth have indeed come to an end. Not to mention external causes, let's talk about corruption in Ukraine, and many countries have been dissuaded. Long before the outbreak of a new round of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, NATO began to get impatient.
In addition, up to now, the United States has spent more than 100 billion US dollars, and Ukraine has not seized an absolute advantage when the support is continuous, and now it is throwing money into it, unless it is really too much money to spend. Moreover, Ukraine, which has always been in the first place, has not caused major trouble to Russia, which further shows that the winning point is not in the amount of support.
Secondly, Europe's production capacity is definitely a big problem. It is true that Europe has relied on military alliances to be less prepared for danger in times of peace, but the United States has also riveted its strength in the process of "de-industrializing" Europe.
It is not so much that Europe is not competitive and has soft ears, but that the United States has done things absolutely well.