In recent years, a craze called the "Modern Horizon Movement" has swept the world. Flat-level theorists believe in the shocking theory that the Earth is not a sphere, but a huge flat surface like a cake. They firmly believe that the Antarctic is enclosed by a wall of ice, centered on the North Pole, to prevent the sea from overflowing. There are even proponents who claim that there are armed men on the edge of Antarctica to prevent people from jumping off cliffs. This theory includes not only the shape of the earth, but also the atmospheric cover, the size of the sun and the moon, the United Nations symbols, navigation routes, space exploration, gravitation, and many other fields. But how do we judge the shape of the earth?How to explain the various phenomena?The following are the doubts and refutations of the horizon theory.
First, levelists refer to the shape of the earth. They believe that the phenomenon of ships on the horizon is one of the evidences, but in fact, standing on the seashore to observe the ships is not "crawling" out of the horizon, but is affected by the visual angle and the curvature of the earth. Similarly, lunar eclipses, constellation positions, observation of high objects, and the curvature of the Earth provide evidence that the Earth is a sphere.
Flattenists deny that the Sun is about 93 million miles away from the Earth, insisting that the Sun is only 4,000 kilometers away. However, we can infer the shape of the Earth from astronomical observations and the morphology of other planets, which all show spherical features. Although Earth is unique, the planets we observe all show spherical properties.
Flat-level theorists accuse NASA of posting that the Earth's ** has been PS-treated, claiming that these ** have traces of copying and pasting. However, the **and** taken by scientists through satellites and spacecraft show the true face of the Earth, and these data and information are widely accepted by the scientific community.
Horizontists have put forward their views on physical concepts such as gravity and gravitation, but these ideas have not been scientifically proven. They tried to prove the shape of the Earth by hitting the "sky" with a rocket, but could not explain the phenomenon of the release of rocket parachutes. In addition, they tried to prove that the sun was closer to the Earth by observing images of the sun under clouds and planes crossing the sun, but this "evidence" lacked scientific basis and explanation.
Although doubts and challenges are the driving force of scientific progress, the theory of flatness theory still lacks sufficient scientific support. By observing phenomena, astronomical data, and other planetary features, we can conclude that the Earth is a sphere. Therefore, discussions about the shape of the earth need to be based on scientific evidence and observations, rather than one-sided assumptions and opinions.
All in all, while the horizon theory presents a unique view, the scientific consensus on the shape of the Earth remains that it is a sphere. We should know and understand the world based on scientific data and facts, not influenced by a single theory.
This article covers the prevailing horizon theory and its refutations, and provokes me to think deeply about the shape of the earth. Flatness has sparked a heated discussion on the internet in recent years, but in my opinion, I firmly believe that the Earth is a sphere, not a flat, cake-like plane.
Horizon theorists have come up with a range of ideas, such as the phenomenon of ships on the horizon, the distance of the sun, the reality of NASA**, and so on. However, these ideas seem to lack scientific basis and experimental evidence, and are more like hypotheses based on speculation and one-sided observations. For example, when referring to the phenomenon of horizon ships, we can verify the curvature of the Earth by observing experiments such as lunar eclipses, constellation positions, and viewing the horizon from above, which show evidence that the Earth is a sphere.
The article also mentions the general consensus of the scientific community on the shape of the Earth, which is not only based on superficial observations, but also relies on a large amount of scientific data, astronomical observations, and the study of planetary characteristics. From these studies, we can deduce that the Earth is a sphere, which is similar in morphology to other planets, in accordance with the universal laws of nature.
Of course, questioning and exploration are key to the development of science, but this also needs to be based on science, not on one-sided or unfalsifiable assumptions. In this information** age, we must know how to distinguish between true and false information, and gain insights from reliable scientific data and research.
In general, the question of the shape of the earth, although it has caused widespread debate and heated discussion to a certain extent, based on the support of scientific observations and data, I still firmly believe that the earth is a sphere, not a flat plane as described by the horizon theory. For this issue, it is important to maintain trust in science and to explore and understand the truth of the world in an objective and rational manner.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!