Wood shows in the forest, the wind will destroy it, this is for sure, in the face of doubts, Xiaomi should adhere to its own development route, do its own thing. After a long time, consumers and users will naturally understand Xiaomi's efforts, after all, no consumer is a fool, what do you think?Xiaomi has recently made two responses, both of which are related to Huawei, in fact, for these two responses, many people feel that Xiaomi has no need to respond at all, but Xiaomi has responded, why is this?
Regarding these two responses, one is that Yu Chengdong talked about the relationship between the hinge and the keel.
According to Jiemian News, Yu Chengdong once said, "When friends plagiarized, they said that they didn't respect our (Huawei's) intellectual property rights, and they just made up a name and said their own." The double-rotating droplet hinge directly becomes the keel hinge, and the keel does not exist. ”
Although Yu Chengdong did not name "Xiaomi", "Keel" is the name of Xiaomi's hinge design that debuted on its foldable screen phone, Mix Fold 3, in August this year.
This time, Xiaomi took the initiative to carry out Yu Chengdong, although it did not sue Yu Chengdong, but also warned Yu Chengdong: "We ask Mr. Yu Chengdong to follow the basic rules of 'science and rigor', and do not smear his peers and mislead the public." ”
Of course, after Yu Chengdong put this matter on the surface, he did not respond a second time, and this matter was not resolved except after leaving netizens to talk about.
The second response was because a chip company was cracked by the Public Security Bureau in a "case of infringement of chip technology trade secrets".
On December 21 this year, the Economic Crime Investigation Corps of the Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau revealed a news: Cai Ye, deputy head of the Food and Drug Environmental Investigation Corps of the Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau, introduced that on April 19 this year, Shanghai ** with the strong cooperation of Jiangsu **, successfully arrested 14 suspects in the "infringement of chip technology trade secrets" case, at present, 4 main suspects have been arrested in accordance with the law on suspicion of infringing trade secrets, and the remaining 10 suspects have been released on bail pending trial in accordance with the law.
This time Xiaomi also took the initiative to respond, saying that it has nothing to do with them, they are just a financial investment.
In fact, for these two first two responses, it is indeed a bit redundant.
After all, the first keel thing, is Xiaomi infringing?Xiaomi has its own patents, and Huawei has not sued them, so it doesn't matter if they don't respond. For the second thing, the public security department did not find Xiaomi, indicating that it has nothing to do with Xiaomi.
However, why did Xiaomi take the initiative to respond to these two things?In fact, it is none other than these three reasons.
The first reason: Xiaomi feels that it is necessary to respond to this matter.
Because many netizens have carried out some guidance on the Internet, or said some self-**, especially since ** does not know the truth, which is not very beneficial to Xiaomi.
* and since**, for Xiaomi, there are two functions, on the one hand, it has been positively promoted to Xiaomi, and for Xiaomi's brand and so on, it is a kind of brand and well-known diffusion. On the other hand, if some negative or improper statements are disseminated, it will definitely damage the image of Xiaomi.
Therefore, Xiaomi feels that it is necessary to respond to a certain extent, so that consumers or netizens know the truth of this matter.
The second reason: Xiaomi wants to avoid these negative influences, or negative news and news.
Or to say a blocking cut off from these negatives. Because Yu Chengdong said that the keel is based on the double hinge of water droplets, some improvements have been made, that is, a new name. In the case of chips, it is because Xiaomi has investment, occupies a certain amount of shares, and there is an executive serving in it.
Therefore, if these two things really have nothing to do with Xiaomi, it must be fake, and Xiaomi has something to do with these two things.
However, these relationships are not enough to say that Xiaomi is wrong, or even illegal. If Xiaomi is at fault or infringes Huawei's patents, then Huawei's legal department will definitely sue Xiaomi, including the Public Security Bureau, and Xiaomi will also be found. In fact, none of this happened, which shows that these things that Xiaomi does must be legal.
The third reason: Xiaomi's image and sense of responsibility make Xiaomi take the initiative to respond to these two things.
Xiaomi, which has always wanted to represent the Chinese technology community, is in fact a young Chinese Fortune 500 company, and it is indeed a well-known large enterprise. At the same time, Lei Jun is a well-known person in both business and political circles, and has also reported on Xiaomi many times.
Xiaomi represents a positive, positive corporate image, and Xiaomi itself does not allow these negative news, or negative news, to affect Xiaomi's positive image. Therefore, it is necessary for Xiaomi to take the initiative to explain the things of the past two years.
In view of the above three reasons, it is necessary for Xiaomi to take the initiative to stand up and respond to these two things, but these two things, after Xiaomi's response, can they really be solved, or can they dispel the doubts of consumers and netizens?
Definitely not. Wood shows in the forest, the wind will blow, that's for sure,** said that striking iron still needs its own hardness, in the face of these doubts, Xiaomi should actually adhere to its own development line and do its own thing, just like Huawei.
In the face of greater ups and downs, Huawei can ignore it, concentrate on doing its own thing, and return after several years of hard work.
After a long time, consumers and users will naturally understand Xiaomi's efforts, after all, no consumer is a fool, what do you think?
*From the Internet, infringement must be deleted).