Who would have thought that the opening drama of 2024 workers would start with various fancy layoffs?
In the past, a company moved from the CBD to the mountains for layoffs, and the existing female executives forcibly resigned and shouted "I will be dismissed illegally".
The viciousness of this attitude and the arrogance of the arrogance are really eye-opening.
And when the employees repeatedly asked to follow the process according to the labor law, the female executive threw out the sentence that shattered the three views, "Can you control it if I break the law"?
Seeing that the employees still insisted on waiting for labor arbitration, the female executives were even more domineering and clamoring to call 110.
Shouldn't the employee who should have been fired to call the police?
Who the hell speaks human words?Who can't understand human speech?
The answer is obvious.
And they are in such a hurry to get rid of people, is it for the so-called "layoffs and advancement"?
I don't know if the money is in, but virtue is really lacking.
And that's not all.
She also threatened the employee while making gestures: "You go and sue me, there are people in the first and second trials, and you will be guaranteed that you will not be able to find a job within two years." ”
So, who gave her the arrogant confidence to flout the law?
I don't know, but now all Chinese have seen her face.
And who wouldn't be able to find a job for two and a half years?
We'll see.
Of course, this is far from the end of the story.
In the face of the company's statement on the suspension of female executives for reflection, employees who were suspected of being fired came out again.
He said that the female executive and the boss are alumni, and the relationship is very iron, and the "suspension" is just to avoid the limelight, and she will come back after that.
Later, the employee revealed that the reason for his dismissal was not "incompetent", but because he opposed the company's use of pirated software to design chips and outsource business.
And if the revelations are true, this is undoubtedly a bombshell with more weight than labor disputes.
You know, tech companies use pirated software, which in itself is a bad joke.
And the software he mentioned is not ordinary office software, and it involves a huge amount of money.
Isn't this the company smashing the employees' jobs and the employees lifting the company's pot?
Now, this is no longer a matter that can end with the resolution of personnel disputes.
What the hell is pirated software all about?Does this company cheat or not?
And who is the "someone" that this female executive is talking about?
They should all be checked.
Looking at this matter, the whistleblower may not be justified, but the worker is absolutely vulnerable.
Otherwise, why did he find out that he was "incompetent" when he was almost 6 months old?
Why was it that after he exposed the company's use of pirated software, he was also exposed to academic fraud?
But then again, is the efficiency of this company all in half a year?
"Incompetent" has to be inspected for half a year to know, and it takes half a year for academic fraud to be transferred out
What's "incompetent"?Where did so many coincidental "reversals" come from?
Rather, the price of telling the truth is to be purged out.
What's more, the cost of protecting workers' rights is too high, and the cost of violating the law by employers is too low.
It is precisely because there are so many individuals who defend their rights, and even if they win, they are only examples of "crushing victories".
Therefore, there will be countless migrant workers who have been "laid off", and in the end, they are all aggrieved "voluntary resignations".
Therefore, there will be companies moving to the mountains to work and exploiting legal loopholes.
That's why there is the existence of this blatant and arrogant female executive.
Why would a female executive boldly admit that "I'm breaking the law"?
It's not that she doesn't understand the Fa, it's that she understands the Fa too well.
That's why she confidently believes that all migrant workers are the same, and she will definitely quit because she is worried that she can't afford to defend her rights.
Only this time, she didn't expect that this employee did not go to labor arbitration, but directly "promoted to the court".
How to say it, if you want to evaluate this matter with conscience, morality, and law, it is actually not comprehensive enough, after all, the information exposed is also limited.
But there is a law of cyber case solving, that is, once you try to control **, it must be when you start to bury mines.
In the end, it will inevitably be eaten back.
One thing is certain, and that is that we support you in defending your legitimate rights and interests.
Contradictions are never the end, but the beginning of solving them.
All questions can only be found in the open under the sun and explored in discussions.
Which is right and which is wrong?
Let the bullets fly a little longer.