The Yalu River is a special existence in the hearts of the people of China and the DPRK, and has witnessed the firm friendship and arduous journey. In 2009, leaders pledged to build the Yalu River Bridge to boost the economy**, however, the 2.2 billion yuan investment bridge has not been opened to traffic for a long time
Why hasn't the bridge of communication between the DPRK and China been open for 8 years?
Premier Wen Jiabao visited the DPRK in 2009 and reached an agreement on the construction of the Yalu River Bridge. The two sides discussed for a long time and launched an investment of 2.2 billion. However, the main body of the bridge was built in only 3 years, but it was never opened to traffic for the next 8 years
The main body of the bridge is 33 meters wide and more than 3,000 meters long, and adopts a double-tower double-cable surface structure. Why was such a huge project completed in just a few years, but fell into a "quiet period" of 8 years?To solve this puzzle, we have to go back in time to the history of two other bridges over the Yalu River.
Sisterhood Bridge" testimony and heaviness.
In addition to the new bridge, there are also "sister bridges" on the Yalu River: an old bridge and a broken bridge, witnessing 80 years of friendly exchanges between China and North Korea.
Historic "Sister Bridge".
In 1909, the Japanese army built up to 944The 2-meter bridge has become the first passage between the two countries. However, after the outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War, the US military blew it up in 1950, leaving only the broken bridge. This history also gives us a better understanding of why North Korea is cautious about building a new bridge.
From 1937 to 1943, North Korea built the Old Bridge, which became a major communication route between China and North Korea during the war. In the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the bridge played a key role and provided the main channel for our country to assist North Korea. However, as time passed, the bridge was no longer able to meet the needs of both countries.
Troubles and expectations for the construction of the new bridge.
In 2011, the foundation stone of the new bridge was laid and construction is ready to begin. However, the North Korean side did not do it immediately, perhaps because of its dependence on the old bridge, or perhaps because of financial pressures. The route planning for the construction of the bridge has also caused controversy, increasing the cost of communication between the two sides.
North Korea's waiting and China's patience.
In 2015, China completed the construction of the main body of the bridge, and the expert team went to North Korea to inspect and showed great sincerity. However, until the completion of the construction of our country, the North Korean side still did not start construction. Is North Korea's reliance on the old bridge enough, or is there something else that has slowed them off to build a new one?
The bridge of friendship is the reason for the delay in setting sail.
The delay in the construction of the new bridge may be due to the fact that North Korea believes that the old bridge can still support the first exchange, and the financial distress and the relative lag of the economy are also considerations. The controversy over the location of the bridge and North Korea's opposition to the route were a major factor in the time-consuming.
Expectations for the future and dreams for bridges.
Although the DPRK has not started the construction of the new bridge at this stage, with the witness of the historical "sister bridge", we are still full of expectations for the future friendship between the two countries. It is hoped that the new bridge will be put into use as soon as possible and become a new link for economic and trade exchanges between China and the DPRK, connecting the common dreams of the two countries.
Epilogue.
The China-North Korea Yalu River Bridge has witnessed the firmness of friendship and the baptism of the years. Although the new bridge has not been opened to traffic for a long time, it is this bridge that carries the vicissitudes of history of the two countries and will also become a witness to friendly exchanges in the future. It is hoped that the two countries will work together to usher in a new era of this bridge at an early date.
The mystery of the construction of the Yalu River Bridge and the fact that it has not been opened to traffic for 8 years has triggered people's deep thinking about the friendship between China and North Korea, historical testimony and international development. This bridge is not only an infrastructure project, but also a symbol of the long-term friendly relations between China and North Korea.
First of all, the article vividly outlines the background of the construction of the Yalu River Bridge. The leaders' visits and the signing of the agreement have demonstrated the good political mutual trust and close economic ties between the two countries. However, the mystery of the bridge, which has not been opened to traffic for eight years, has become a puzzling problem. This mystery has not only raised concerns about the depth of China-North Korea friendship, but also raised concerns about the pressure on North Korea's economic development. The article profoundly points out the possibility that North Korea may not be able to invest in construction in time due to its economic lag, so that readers can better understand North Korea's predicament on this issue.
Secondly, through the review of the history of the "Sister Bridge", the article allows readers to have a deeper understanding of the friendly relations between the two sides of the Yalu River. The old bridge and the broken bridge carry the firm cooperation between China and North Korea in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, and witness the years full of hardships and dedication. Such a historical witness makes the Yalu River Bridge not only an infrastructure connecting the two countries, but also a link that carries the historical memories and emotions of both sides.
In addition, the article gives a detailed description of the construction process of the Yalu River Bridge, from the design of the bridge to the construction process, and then to the final opening to traffic. Such a description allows the reader to clearly see the entire construction process and makes it easier to understand North Korea's hesitation on this issue. The painstaking work in the design, construction and restoration of the bridge revealed in the article is a deep respect for the builders and makes the reader feel more empathy for the bridge.
Overall, this review provides readers with a more comprehensive understanding of this interesting topic through an in-depth analysis of the history of the Yalu River Bridge, the construction process, and the reasons why it was not opened to traffic. The article's discussion of China-North Korea friendship, historical witness, and international development makes readers think about a wider range of issues while reading, and provides a useful perspective for deepening the understanding of China-North Korea relations.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!