Less than 24 hours after his inauguration, Argentina's new Javier Milley began implementing a program called "Streamlining", which reduced the original 18 departments to nine. This initiative has brought about a large-scale social experiment in Argentine society, which has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions.
The phenomenon of ** department reduction mentioned in the original article has indeed solved the problem of redundant personnel in Argentina to a certain extent. For a long time, political corruption has led to the expansion of the internal department of **, and the number of civil servants is too large relative to the size of the population, which has affected the administrative efficiency of **. According to statistics, the number of civil servants in Argentina is 7% of the population, much higher than the 3% in China. Such a situation has seriously hampered Argentina's economic development and social progress.
However, a one-size-fits-all approach does not guarantee an increase in administrative efficiency. This reduction in the department may lead to uneven capabilities for new incumbents, and it is inevitable that the greater concentration of power will further affect efficiency. For example, the new Minister of Security, Patricia Bridge, is notorious for being involved in police brutality and gender discrimination. Therefore, while reducing the number of departments, it is particularly important to train and select excellent civil servants and officials.
This change in Argentina has attracted a lot of attention from the international community, especially China. China and Argentina have close cooperation in economic and trade exchanges and international affairs, so the reform measures made by Argentina will have a certain impact on the industries and enterprises of China and Argentina.
A series of policies adopted by Argentina**, such as the full opening of the market, the abandonment of state-owned assets, the privatization of health care, the abolition of medical supervision by the Ministry of Health, and the liberalization of immigration supervision, have aroused concerns and questions. There seems to be some contradiction in these policies, such as "legal" and "ban abortion", two theoretically diametrically opposed policies. This has raised concerns and reflections about the consequences of these policies, especially about the flow of lives and capital. It also makes people think about what the capital behind these policies is going for Argentina.
Milley's policy initiatives since taking office have been Zelensky-esque, and his background and experience have made some young people look forward to him. However, reform is not achieved overnight and requires long-term effort and practice. The problems facing Argentine society are complex and deep-seated, and the changes need to be gradual and gradual in stability to avoid greater social shocks.
China and Argentina should strengthen exchanges and communication in cooperation and jointly explore solutions. As the world's second largest economy, China should do its best to support Argentina's reform efforts and share its development experience and ideas. At the same time, Chinese enterprises also need to be more prudent and cautious in their investment and cooperation in Argentina, fully understand and assess Argentina's policy environment and risks, and ensure mutual benefit and win-win cooperation between the two sides.
In short, the transformation in Argentina has brought many food for thought and questions. This large-scale social experiment will provide valuable lessons for countries to better understand and respond to the challenges and opportunities in similar situations. As a responsible major country, China should actively participate in and promote international cooperation and jointly contribute to building a community with a shared future for mankind.