From the perspective of military scientists, the political turmoil in Argentina is an international phenomenon worthy of attention. Javier Milley's rise to power is not only a change in political figures, but also the dawn of a new era full of adventure and uncertainty. From a broad military-tactical perspective, political stability is an important part of a country's hard power, and Argentina is facing unprecedented challenges in this regard. As we all know, Argentina has long been plagued by economic difficulties and political corruption. Its domestic political environment is complex, and the competition between various factions and ideologies is fierce. On the international stage, Argentina has always tried to maintain an independent foreign policy, but under the general trend of globalization, its economy is closely connected to the outside world, which makes its political decisions not only affect the domestic situation, but also may generate broader international fluctuations. Before Javier Milley came to power, Argentina had been trying to maintain a balance in international relations, especially in economic and trade relations with China. As a world economic power, China's investment and assistance to Argentina cannot be ignored. However, with Milley's rise to power, that balance seems to have been challenged.
During his election campaign, he expressed his dissatisfaction with the current state of international relations and advocated a series of radical domestic reforms. From the point of view of military science, the streamlining of ** is not a negative practice, especially in the presence of a lot of bureaucracy and inefficiency. However, Milley's policy reforms could have profound military and security implications. For example, streamlining the sector** could affect the country's ability to manage public safety and national defense. The redistribution of responsibilities and personnel changes in the security sector can lead to inadequate oversight and affect the country's ability to respond to emergencies. The policy moves behind Milley reflect deeper political and economic motivations. The full opening of the market, the abandonment of state-owned assets and the privatization of health care will greatly change the structure of the Argentine economy. These measures may attract foreign investment and improve economic efficiency in the short term, but in the long term, they may make Argentina more dependent on external capital and affect its autonomy in international affairs. For military scientists, such external dependence may to some extent weaken the strategic autonomy of the state. The political actions of Javier Milley within 24 hours of taking office can be described as shocking at home and abroad.
He quickly fulfilled his campaign promises and implemented the so-called "Streamline" program. In the context of the world's efforts to enhance its functions and improve administrative efficiency, Milley has chosen a different path. Streamlining measures were implemented to reduce the number of departments from 18 to 9. This kind of radical structural adjustment is rare in history. The abolition of key sectors such as education, labour, social development, transport and public works will undoubtedly trigger widespread social repercussions. The disappearance or integration of these departments into other sectors is inevitably a cause for concern about the efficiency and quality of management. In countries where the economy is already weak and social contradictions are intensifying, such reforms are tantamount to adding fuel to the fire. Milley's decisions reflect a kind of gambling politics that seeks to quickly change the face of the country through radical reforms. The Ministry of Health's reservation may be motivated by practical considerations, and given the impact of the pandemic and the importance of health security, it may be a manifestation of a hint of rationality in the midst of radical reforms. Behind this reform, however, is a neglect of the country's long-standing problems. The bloated and inefficient institutions of Argentina need to be addressed gradually, not in a simple and drastic manner.
Milley's policy is not without reason, and the reform itself is aimed at improving efficiency and quality of service. But its methods and steps are debatable. Sudden and drastic reforms can lead to short-term confusion in the functioning of the ** and may even trigger social instability. Perhaps the most striking of these is the ripple effects of domestic reforms, including changes in laws and social norms. For example, the seemingly contradictory policies on legalization and prohibition of abortion actually reflect the confusion of moral legislation and the simplistic treatment of social problems. In addition, the influence of the capital forces behind Milley on Argentina should not be underestimated. A series of opening-up policies and privatization reforms may put important resources and interests of the state into the hands of foreign investment. This practice may attract investment and boost the economy in the short term, but in the long run, it may harm the interests and security of the country. For military scientists, such policy changes could change Argentina's status and role in international politics, and even affect its eventuality] In Argentina's large-scale social experiment, Javier Milley's rise to power and the radical reforms he implemented provide a unique perspective on how a country seeks to renew itself in the midst of a crisis.
Despite the controversy surrounding the reforms, Argentina's attempt has important global implications. Whatever the outcome, it will be a profound test of political leadership, national governance, and social dynamics. From the point of view of military scientists, the security and stability of a country should not only depend on military force, but also on strong political wisdom and economic strategy. Argentina's experimental reforms may provide valuable lessons for other countries, both positive and negative. In this process, the responsibility and foresight of national leaders are crucial to ensure that policy reforms are in the right direction and in the long-term interests of the country. All in all, Argentina's future is uncertain, but it also holds hope. In these challenging times, more leaders and decision-makers with strategic vision are needed to guide the country towards a prosperous and stable future. For the international community, Argentina's reform experiment will be an important window of observation for the world to witness how a country can explore its own path of development in the midst of turmoil.