This should be the weirdest news of the year.
According to ** report, on December 15, a netizen posted ** that he had formally sued "Xinhua Dictionary" and had sent the prosecution materials to the Yuhang District People's Court of Hangzhou City.
The blogger listed several contents in **: on page 500, the annotation compound of the word "play" is "**sex";On page 31, the note on the word "don't" reads: "A pistol pinned to his waist";On page 284, the annotation of the word "tired" forms the sentence "The child is small and becomes a burden";On page 511, the explanation of the word "Wako" is only "called Japan in ancient times", and the word "Wako" does not appear, and the blogger says that "the historical sins of Wako are written off". At first, I thought this was a joke taken by netizens, right?Or is it irony?Then I found out that this thing was real, and it was really reported ...... the regular **Lose your marbles. Moreover, the important thing is "and", it doesn't matter if one or two people are crazy, on social **, there are countless netizens who like it and follow them crazy. I'm getting more and more unable to understand some of the current wind directions. 
These definitions are just an example. Could it be that only positive examples can be used as examples?Playing is itself a derogatory term, no matter what object it is followed by, it is nothing more than expressing that the subject's behavior is immoral, improper, very bad, etc. For such a derogatory term, the subject of the game is generally the strong, and the object is the weak. Could it be that "playing with men", for example, can be accepted by the public?If so, those who find fault can blame the other way around: what does it mean to play with men?Are you accusing women of immorality?Isn't it true that most of the people in society are being toyed with?You see, both the pros and the back are wrong. But if they want to pick thorns, you will be thorns all over you. I was wondering how to form a sentence to be a proper examplePlaying with employees?Playing with the boss?Playing with subordinates?Playing with the leader?Playing with children?Playing with the ...... adultsJust remove "toying" from the dictionary. You will find that there is not a single example that satisfies these people, and they themselves cannot come up with a better example. Their purpose may only be to harm or even destroy, and destruction is their only role in society. 
Besides, there is no definition of "倭寇" in the so-called "倭寇". How can I say this, it's like a person who wears a suit but doesn't wear a tie, and only ends up being pointed at his nose and scolded. Of course, wearing a suit itself can also be scolded. Without this phrase, the sins of the Japanese are written offIf you don't have the words "Down with Japanese imperialism" on the door of your house, does it also write off the history of Japan's invasion of China?If there is no "倭寇" in the definition of "寇", is it also a sin?If all the phrases are written, can you hold the Xinhua dictionary?While we talk about this absurdity, there is also a premise: according to their logic, the Xinhua dictionary itself also represents a certain legitimacy. As a result, they became ruthless and even scolded Xinhua Dictionary. This may also indicate that there are fewer and fewer things that can make them attack, and they are more and more. It's a situation where wolves have more meat and less meat. Of course, they never touch the real problem, they know that the risk is in **, and they also know that the traffic is in **. These people are only responsible for creating problems, not for problems. Someday, they will gnaw the ground under their feet. The internet celebrity sued Xinhua Dictionary