Former Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines was ordered to "mute" for political reasons, causing his two programs on ** to be suspended. Duterte's strong reaction to this, accusing the violation of the constitutional right to free speech, has attracted widespread attention. Whether or not there is a fierce political struggle behind this incident has become the focus of attention.
In today's world, freedom of expression is an important and sensitive subject. Recently, the former Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines has clashed with the current one over this issue. Marcos' Filipino** order banning Duterte from making any public speeches or comments has sparked widespread concern at home and abroad.
Duterte expressed strong displeasure after accepting the order and accused Marcos of violating his constitutional right to free speech. He stressed that as a citizen, he has the right to express his views and opinions. For a person who has served as a ** and led the country for many years, this restriction is obviously unacceptable.
Duterte also slammed the violation of the right to freedom of the press. In his view, this not only affects him, but also ignores and tramples on the rights and interests of all Filipino citizens. "If today I can be deprived of the right to speak," he warned, "then tomorrow other citizens may be deprived of the same rights." ”
Observers at home and abroad have expressed concern about Marcos's move. It has been suggested that this may be an illustration of an attempt to silence dissenting voices;While others fear that without freedom of speech, the Philippines could slide into ** rule.
In the face of criticism, Marcos insisted that his actions were legal and noted that Duterte, as a former, should respect the decisions of the current leadership. They believe that the ban on Duterte's public remarks is not a personal repression against him, but out of the interests of *** and social stability.
The debate over free speech continues. On the one hand, Duterte and his supporters are adamant about this ban and calling for the restoration of their right to free speech;Marcos**, on the other hand, remained firm and said he would continue to implement the order.
The incident has once again raised questions about the core values of power, freedom and justice. Whatever the outcome, we aspire to see a Philippines that respects the fundamental rights of every citizen and guarantees freedom of expression.
In any country, citizens should have the right to express their views and opinions. For Duterte, he not only needs to defend his rights and interests as a former leader, but also needs to defend the right to freedom of speech of all Filipino citizens with practical actions. Marcos should also realize that only on the premise of respecting and protecting the basic rights of citizens can social stability and stability be truly achieved
The resurgence of political turmoil in the Philippines, with Deputy Sara Duterte accused of misusing classified funds, has sparked widespread concern and concern at home and abroad. And at this sensitive moment, news came that the House of Representatives had canceled its appropriations for 2024, which undoubtedly increased the pressure on the Duterte family.
Deputy ** Sara has been accused of misusing classified funds by taking advantage of her position, even though she has always maintained her innocence and denied all charges related to it. In a country steeped in controversy and skepticism, the public is increasingly wary of the actions of their public officials. As the situation has progressed to this point, even some of the parties that had originally supported Sara have begun to waver.
The Duterte family, which has a significant influence in the Philippines, has also been hit recently. After Arroyo took over the power from him, his original position and influence were also frustrated. Arroyo, who has been demoted to the rank of ordinary lawmaker, could further weaken the Duterte family's position on the **.
What is even more worrying is that Duterte has publicly published threats to "kill" politicians who dare to question and accuse him. Such behaviour is unacceptable in any democratic society and could lead to a larger political upheaval.
Although Duterte himself has begun to take steps to protect himself and his family from further blows, it is clear that the political storm is far from over. Marcos** ordered Duterte to remain silent. This undoubtedly shows that Marcos is very concerned about the current situation and hopes to curb Duterte's possible overreaction by "banning".
All this turmoil and uncertainty once again highlights the problems in the current political system in the Philippines, and it also reflects the deep concern of domestic and foreign observers about the future direction of the Philippines. It is clear that this political storm has brought tremendous pressure to the stability and development of the Philippines.
After so many turmoil, it is clear that the Filipino people's concern for the future of the country has reached an unprecedented high. Despite the uncertainty that seems to be all that is going on at the moment, we still expect the Philippines to properly handle these controversies and challenges, and finally move towards a new chapter that is more fair, transparent, and orderly. Let's actively anticipate and pay close attention to what will happen next.
Behind Duterte's "silence" incident, the family's political power has been dealt a heavy blow. The House of Representatives' ruling to cancel funding for her department was seen as a failure of the Duterte family's political struggle, as her daughter Sara was involved in a confidential funding scandal. This series of events has also put Duterte and his allies in a difficult situation in the Philippines.