At the high school level, liberal arts students are often seen as having poor grades in Xi and no way out. This notion is very evident in the chain of school contempt. Among the key classes, the science class is extremely prominent, while the liberal arts class is arranged at the end. Liberal arts majors have a lower employment rate due to the impact of social demand, while science majors have a higher employment rate in comparison. This has led to a growing sense of superiority over liberal arts students among science students. It is undeniable that this phenomenon is largely due to the pursuit of economic benefits by society. However, this chain of contempt is not fair, and liberal arts students are actually valuable and contribute to society.
For liberal arts students, the hardships they face are no less than those of science students. At the high school level, society often links Xi academic performance to salary, which makes many students have to give up their real interests and follow the so-called "career-ready" science majors. However, this tendency can lead some students who would otherwise be better suited to pursue a career in the liberal arts to pursue a career in the sciences at a high cost. This distorted concept invisibly affects students' interest and motivation Xi learning. In addition, schools and parents also put a lot of pressure on students to take the risk of choosing a liberal arts major and focus on science. This vicious circle leads to low overall performance in liberal arts classes and low motivation of teachers, which in turn affects the admission of liberal arts majors and the quality of graduates in universities.
At the college level, the chain of contempt between liberal arts majors is also more pronounced. Contempt for teachers, students, and the workplace all exist to some extent. Teachers of mathematics, physics and chemistry generally believe that they chose mathematics, physics and chemistry because they have a good brain, while liberal arts teachers must not have learned mathematics, physics and chemistry before turning to liberal arts. In addition, mathematics, physics and chemistry teachers have relatively high incomes due to the need for remedial Xi, while liberal arts teachers have relatively little remedial Xi needs. This makes math, physics and chemistry teachers often feel full of superiority over themselves. In addition, Chinese teachers are often considered to be unable to understand the laws of science, which is a joke. However, this concept is very one-sided and fails to reflect the importance and value of different subject areas.
Liberal arts students have always played an important role in Chinese history and have had a profound impact on society. Confucius, as the first great educator in Chinese history to establish a private school, trained many liberal arts students. These liberal arts students played an important role in the feudal system of ancient Chinese society and became the mainstay of society. Guided by the Confucian ideology of "learning from the best, learning from the best", they are committed to providing the people with services to protect their homes and defend the country, live and work in peace and contentment, and improve their literacy. This kind of thinking has influenced China for thousands of years and has played an important role in history. The imperial examination system also made the liberal arts the main direction of selection, and Confucianism became the orthodoxy that ruled the people.
In modern times, the importance of liberal arts cannot be overlooked. In China's reform and opening up, literati thought played an important role in the development of society. **In his early years, he studied Xi at Hunan No. 1 Normal School and trained him to major in teacher education, which is also a typical liberal arts student. He used to be a history teacher and lectured on party classes and philosophy. Today, many of those who think that science students are superior have grown up under the guidance of Marxist theory and ideology. Even Marx himself was a liberal arts student, majoring in law, history, and philosophy. The contribution of liberal arts students to society should not be underestimated.
The liberal arts and sciences are not mutually incompatible, but complement and reinforce each other. In modern society, the development of science and technology is inseparable from the contribution of science, but the progress of society also needs the thinking and guidance of the humanities. Many of the world's major issues, such as environmental protection, social justice, and human relations, cannot only be solved with the knowledge and methods of the sciences, but also require research and thinking from the humanities. For example, how to resolve conflicts between human beings, how to promote social fairness and justice, and how to protect the natural environment all require the thinking and methods of the humanities. The combination of liberal arts and sciences can better promote the development and progress of society.
In real life, no matter how good a science student is, he or she also needs to know a certain amount of humanistic knowledge and humanistic qualities. A person who lacks humanistic qualities will be limited not only in communication and interpersonal relationships, but also in the workplace. In the same way, a person who lacks scientific knowledge cannot know and understand the world comprehensively. The integration of liberal arts and sciences is necessary for everyone's personal development and social progress.
In conclusion, liberal arts students should not be despised, but respected. The liberal arts and sciences are not antagonistic roles, but rather cooperate and promote each other. Only through the combination of science and liberal arts can we achieve all-round progress and development of human society.