In the ancient art of war, "strong walls and clear fields" was once a highly regarded strategic tool. But can this seemingly conservative move really bring victory at a critical moment?From historical stories to real-world reflections, we re-examine the essence and effectiveness of this strategy.
Historical allusions refer to the strategy of "fortifying the wall and clearing the wilderness" adopted by the ancients during the war. This approach is often interpreted as a passive defense, but in fact it contains the potential to wait for the right moment. However, is it really possible to find an opportunity to attack because of this, or is it just a self-defeating inaction?
Lu Xun once questioned this in "The Doctrine of Clearing the Wilderness of the Fortified Wall": "Although the 'Clearing of the Wilderness' is a method of soldiers, this is a retreat, not an attack. This kind of passive defense is not actually a solution to the problem, but a dilemma of limiting itself to passive defense.
The missing path to victory.
The stories of the ancients describe the application of "strong walls and clear fields" in a variety of contexts. From waiting for reinforcements to waiting for the right moment, this tactic of passive defense has been common throughout history. However, the real opportunity to bring victory rarely arises. The retreat of the enemy and the arrival of reinforcements often failed to materialize on the expected results of these tactics.
Dong Zhuo, Zhang Xianzhong and others mentioned in the historical allusions may be practitioners of "strong walls and clear wilderness", but the result is not a victory. Dong Zhuo Xiu Yiwu and Zhang Xianzhong Qingye killed people, these actions did not bring real stability and victory in the troubled times, but instead exacerbated the chaos and disaster.
The dilemma of passive defense.
"Fortified Clearing" seems to be a passive defense that retreats when encountering problems and does not seek solutions. Rather than finding a way to solve the problem at critical moments, this reactive strategy limits itself to a cycle of inaction.
Lu Xun pointed out, "In military affairs, there is something else to wait for, waiting for the arrival of reinforcements, or the retreat of the enemy;If you just stick to the lonely city, the result will be destruction. "This passive defense is not a viable strategy, and it fails to bring tangible solutions to the challenge.
A wise move or a self-deceptive strategy?
In the face of challenges, choosing to "clear the wall" may be seen as a no-do move. While this approach can preserve temporary security, it is not a real victory. History has shown that passive defense has failed to bring a real solution, but has instead been bogged down.
From ancient warfare to today's society, we may be able to draw on this dilemma of passive defense. When faced with a problem, you should seek positive solutions instead of limiting yourself to passive defenses. Therefore, "strong walls and clear wilderness" may not be the choice of the wise, but the trap of the dilemma.
Re-examining the "clear walls" in historical stories may provide us with a kind of reflection. In real life, actively seeking ways to solve problems may be more likely to bring real victory and relief than passive defense.
Epilogue. "Clearing the wilderness" is certainly an ancient military strategy, but its essence is worth pondering. When faced with challenges, we should perhaps seek to respond proactively, rather than reactively, and this may be the true path to victory.
Fortified Clear"As an ancient tactic, is it a wise decision or a symbol of a dilemma?This topic has sparked a wide range of discussions. The article reviews the cases in history and gives them an in-depth **, which deserves further examination.
in ancient wars"Fortified Clear"Strategy, which may seem like a conservative way of coping, often means being defensive rather than aggressive. This tactic has been used many times throughout history, but the end result has not always been victorious. The article states"Fortified Clear"The core is to wait for the moment, but waiting for reinforcements or enemy forces to retreat is not always possible.
Lu Xun put forward the right in the article"Fortified Clear"argues that its essence is passive defense and does not bring about a real solution. In historical stories, Dong Zhuo, Zhang Xianzhong and others tried to adopt similar strategies, but instead of bringing stability and victory to troubled times, they only exacerbated the chaos.
Article** too"Fortified Clear"pointed out that this strategy often implies a reactive response to the problem and a failure to find a solution. When faced with a challenge, it may be wiser to actively seek solutions. Looking back at history,"Fortified Clear"In many cases a symbol of a dilemma, because it fails to bring substantial victory.
However, I think"Fortified Clear"It's not all without merit. In certain situations, such as waiting for reinforcements to arrive or seeking the best moment, this passive defense may be a reasonable choice. After all, both war and social problems are complex and variable, and taking overly aggressive action may not be the best option.
The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of actively seeking solutions when faced with problems. This is worth pondering. When we face challenges, we need to consider rationally, but what we need more is to be brave enough to meet them and actively seek solutions.
All in all"Fortified Clear"As an ancient strategy, there are pros and cons. However, in real life, when faced with problems, we should be more proactive in seeking solutions, rather than passively waiting for the time to come. This may be the path to true victory and liberation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!