In the vicissitudes of the Red Age, **and**, the former military partner, has now become a chapter in history. On December 16, 1963, **Marshal died of illness in Beijing, however, the only person who was absent at that time was their partner who had worked together for more than 30 years**. This mysterious scene has sparked countless speculations and has become a mystery in history.
The beginning of a partnership.
The cooperation between the two began in 1930, from the Red Fourth Army to the Liaoshen Campaign, ** and *** jointly wrote a piece of red history. However, the cooperation between the two was not all smooth sailing, and there were rumors of many feuds between the two in the early days. **Withdrawn personality, always difficult to get along with partners, so that *** feels headaches many times.
** Compromise and responsibility.
Under the consideration of ***, **became**the**political commissar. Tolerant and kind, extremely firm on issues of principle, and very strong in business ability. He complemented each other and jointly created the glory of the Red Fourth Army. However, some hidden dangers gradually emerged in the relationship between the two.
The shirk of responsibility and the persistence of ***.
In the third anti-"encirclement and suppression" in 1931, there was a problem in the Red Fourth Army, which led to the capture of many wounded and the capture of guns by the enemy. In dealing with the issue of responsibility, ** did not shirk and stood up to take responsibility, but ** was silent on the side. This incident became the fuse for being removed from the post of secretary of the Military Commission.
* The shirk and the rupture are drifting away.
During the Liaoshen Campaign, ** frequently shirked responsibility in handling military affairs. For example, the mistake in attacking Jinzhou pushed the responsibility to his subordinates, which made him feel aggrieved. Such shirk and irresponsible attitude made the rift between the two deeper and deeper.
The contradictions at the Lushan Conference deepened.
At the Lushan Conference in 1959, **'s health deteriorated, and **suggested to *** that ** replace the Minister of Defense, believing that ** was more appropriate. This suggestion was seen as a distrust of himself, which made him even more unhappy.
* selfishness and *** deep understanding.
* During a telegram to attack Jinzhou, he almost changed his mind and attacked Changchun instead. ** Persisting in the attack on Jinzhou finally eased the situation. However, ** thinks that *** is "embarrassed" in front of the chairman, which leads to the deepening of the contradiction between the two.
The end of the rupture and the persistence of ***.
After being removed from the post of secretary of the Military Commission, he did not express his complaints about **, but said that the unity of the party is more important than personal gains and losses. He spoke highly of his principles and contributions to the party. Because of the principle, the contradiction between the body and the ** gradually escalated.
Lin Luo rupture: **The truth at the funeral.
In 1963, *** died, ** was absent from the funeral, and became a historical mystery. In the 20-year cooperation between the two, selfishness, shirking of responsibility, and contradictions and differences gradually made the pair of "Lin Luo" break up.
Epilogue.
The break with *** is a thought-provoking fragment in the history of the Red. shirked responsibility and selfishness, and finally made the pair part ways. At the time of ***'s death, **'s absence became a mystery in history, making this military legend even more mysterious.
The Broken Lin Luo: The Truth at the Funeral" article profoundly reveals the complex and tortuous process of cooperation between ** and ***, and the reasons that ultimately led to the breakup between the two. This complex history shows how interpersonal relationships among the leadership and how selfishness and responsibility influenced political dynamics in the communist movement.
First of all, the article restores the bits and pieces of military cooperation between ** and *** through detailed historical events. **Withdrawn personality, difficult to get along with partners, while *** is known for being tolerant and kind, and strong business ability. This kind of cooperation seems perfect at first, but in fact it is buried with many potential contradictions.
Secondly, the article highlights the key role played by the shirk of responsibility in the cooperation between Lin and Luo. At critical moments, ** frequently pushed the responsibility to his subordinates, especially in the Liaoshen Campaign, and his irresponsible attitude made *** feel aggrieved. The shirking of responsibility became the fuse of the tension between the two, and indirectly led to *** being removed from the post of secretary of the Military Commission.
Moreover, the article mentions **'s selfishness and his distrust of ***. The disgust at "embarrassing" in front of the chairman shows that the contradictions between the leadership are not only at the work level, but also involve issues of personal dignity and authority at a deeper level. This selfishness eventually led to the intensification of the conflict between the two.
Finally, the article praised ***'s performance after the break. Instead of expressing his grievances after being removed from office, he stressed that the unity of the party was more important than personal gains and losses. His principled nature and contribution to the party are highly praised, and this perseverance and dedication are admirable.
On the whole, the article is based on vivid historical facts, deeply analyzes the complex relationship between ** and ***, and shows the rupture between the two through detailed descriptions. This historical story is not only the grievances between the two leaders, but also the complexity of human nature and the fierceness of political struggle in the political arena. Through in-depth and detailed narration, the article enables readers to better understand the tortuous course of the leadership within the Chinese communist movement.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!