The verdict reveals a story of marital betrayal. The husband, Mr. Chen, sued for the return of alimony, divorce and compensation for moral damages. The woman, Yu, refuted these demands one by one
denied the derailment and accused Mr. Chen of bribing the testing agency. However, Mr. Chan appeared in court to argue that he could not have been involved in making false reports and expressed his willingness to redo the paternity test.
The woman's argument was questioned by ** and criticized by netizens. The case also involved issues such as alimony and property division, and the woman's arguments were also refuted by the evidence of Mr. Chen and his sister. Throughout the proceedings,
The woman's argument makes people feel quibble, shirk responsibility, and still do not admit her cheating behavior in the face of evidence. The impact of this verdict is significant, as marriage concerns almost every family
If the betrayers get away with it, it will trigger a crisis of confidence and people will lose the cost of restraining mistakes. This makes people wonder how to protect the fairness and integrity of the marriage system
and how to deal with marital betrayal. These issues require us to think deeply and discuss. What do you think about this case?
What are your thoughts on this matter?Comments are welcome**!
Disclaimer: The process described in the article **is all on the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy, without vulgarity and other bad guidance. If copyright or character infringement is involved, please contact us to delete or make changes in time. 】
3. The baby is not the man's biological child, and the woman also asks for a share of the property