With the development of the education industry, the selection of school leaders has become a topic of much concern and controversy. In this regard, an article titled "Teachers are hurt!".It turns out that the selection of school leaders is all a formality" article has aroused widespread discussion. The author, a veteran teacher with 30 years of teaching experience, denounced the injustices and inaccuracies in the selection process for school leaders. The author's post aroused the resonance of the majority of teachers, and they left messages expressing their sadness and helplessness about this situation. The article describes in detail the process of selecting a middle-level leader, revealing the problems and the appearance of acting. The author bluntly notes that the current selection process has seriously lost its real meaning and has turned into a farce of formalism.
The selection process for middle-level leaders was once considered relatively fair and transparent. The inspection of the Personnel Division of the Education Bureau and the principal's fanfare gave people a sense of seriousness and rigor. However, the truth is brutal. The positions to be promoted and the employment criteria were quickly brushed aside, and there was no full discussion and weighing at all. The voting process is part of a false show, and the votes for the promotion list are more like decorations, and have no meaning to affect the outcome. And the most deeply dissatisfying thing is that this kind of sham selection process is very common in schools, even the selection of principals. The selection of leaders has been completely divorced from the will of teachers and other reasonable election procedures, but completely depends on the power relations and exchange of interests behind them.
This phenomenon is not an exception to individual schools, but a pathological reflection of the education system as a whole. Many teachers have gone through a similar promotion process without raising their voices of doubt. This situation makes one wonder whether it is the teachers who are resigned to it or the entire education system that has lost its spirit of justice and fairness. It can be seen from the comments of netizens that many people have a skeptical attitude towards the school leadership selection mechanism. Citing their own personal experiences, they point out all sorts of chaos and imbalances. Some educators said in their comments that one of the reasons they were afraid to have a second child was because they feared that their children's educational environment would be unjustly affected, because they were well aware of the dark side of the industry. One teacher even affectionately called for the selection of candidates to be faced up to and the transparency and fairness of the selection process should be improved.
In recent years, the unfairness and opacity of the selection mechanism for school leaders has become a serious problem for the teaching profession. Under this system, teachers who are competent and excellent in teaching, but who have no background or are not good at drilling, often do not get the recognition and promotion opportunities they deserve. On the contrary, teachers who are good at stammering and patting horses are often promoted and promoted quickly. This phenomenon has led to the problem of brain drain and waste of capacity in the education sector, which has brought obstacles to the progress and development of the entire education system.
Second, there is a lack of sufficient transparency and fairness in the existing selection process. From the standards and requirements of promotion to the final decision-making and results, there is a lack of openness and full constraints. This has led to all kinds of human intervention and unspoken rules, making the selection process full of speculation and intrigues. At the same time, there is a lack of real supervision and management mechanisms, and there are no effective channels and ways to resolve reports and objections in the selection process, allowing unfairness to persist for a long time.
In addition, there is a lack of attention and respect for teachers' opinions and suggestions. Teachers are important players in the education system and should have a voice and leadership in the selection process. However, in reality, teachers often become passive performers and are unable to participate effectively in decision-making. This situation is not limited to the election of principals, but also has a great degree of unfairness in the selection of middle-level cadres.
In view of the problems existing in the selection mechanism of school leaders, we should improve and solve them from the following aspects:
First, improve the transparency of the selection mechanism. The selection criteria and requirements should be clearly disclosed so that all teachers can understand and follow these standards. At the same time, the selection process should also be open to the public, so that everyone can understand every aspect and detail.
Second, strengthen the supervision and management mechanism. There should be a special regulatory authority to supervise and manage the promotion process. Reports or objections in the promotion process should be investigated and dealt with in a timely manner to ensure the fairness and fairness of the selection.
Finally, respect the opinion of each teacher. Every teacher is an important member of the education system, and more teachers should be involved in decision-making, and their opinions and suggestions should be valued and respected. Teachers can be directly involved in the promotion process and express their opinions and suggestions through the establishment of teachers' congresses or symposiums.
To sum up, the problems in the school leadership selection mechanism need to be taken seriously and solved. By increasing transparency, monitoring and respect for teachers' opinions, the entire selection mechanism can be moved in a more just and equitable direction. Only in this way can we truly achieve the survival of the fittest and promote the sustainable development of the education system.