Gao Huanmin, Zhang Meng.
In 2023, in order to further improve the quality and efficiency of procurement, standardize the procurement process, optimize resource allocation, and improve the efficiency of the use of financial funds, the Finance and Finance Bureau of Zaozhuang High-tech Zone will actively carry out procurement performance evaluation. By optimizing projects, clarifying the focus of evaluation, timely feedback and rectification, strengthening the application of results, and standardizing the management responsibilities of departments, we will promote the quality and efficiency of procurement.
Prioritize projects to ensure the significance of performance evaluation. Zaozhuang High-tech Zone puts the project selection in a prominent position in the procurement performance evaluation work, adheres to the principle of typicality and representativeness, systematically sorts out the best procurement projects in the whole district, and gives priority to the selection of projects that are related to people's lives, have a wide range of influence, and have a high degree of social concern. After multi-party demonstration, the urban greening and maintenance project was finally determined as the key project of procurement performance evaluation, focusing on the procurement demand, procurement budget, procurement plan, organization and management, performance and acceptance, etc., focusing on the performance of the procurement project and the business implementation effect of the comprehensive evaluation.
Precise positioning and clear focus of performance evaluation. The performance evaluation is carried out in a combination of quantitative and qualitative ways, and the business departments of the organization bureau and third-party institutions and industry experts conduct in-depth evaluation of the key points of procurement performance evaluation and clarify the evaluation priorities. The evaluation content covers the whole process management of procurement demand investigation, budget preparation, procurement supervision, etc., and sorts out and formulates 5 first-level indicators including demand relevance, process standardization, policy effectiveness, transaction economy, and internal control15 secondary indicators such as procurement budget, procurement methods and procedures, procurement policy implementation, and contract performance efficiencyThere are 31 first-class indicators such as budget preparation integrity, procurement budget implementation rate, and procurement internal control.
Result-oriented, timely feedback on rectification opinions. The performance evaluation of this procurement project adheres to the process realization and result orientation. Problems were found in the preparation of procurement budget, internal control management, performance acceptance and benefit play, and targeted improvement suggestions were put forward. The performance evaluation report is fed back to the relevant departments at the first time, and rectified within a time limit, so as to promote the results of the process, standardize the expenditure of financial funds to maximize the effect, and also take the performance evaluation results of the procurement project as the key basis for the preparation of the procurement budget in the next year.
Strengthen the application and standardize the management responsibilities of departments. This performance evaluation work comprehensively evaluates the scientificity, efficiency and management level of the implementation of the procurement project, and strengthens the feedback and application of the evaluation results. Put forward corresponding suggestions on the problems found in the evaluation, and urge the departments and units to establish and improve a series of management methods such as procurement and fund management, which have played a good role in promoting the next step of standardizing the procurement procedures, planning and demonstrating projects in advance, and strengthening the internal management responsibilities of the department.