It may not be easy for college students to write an innovative and valuable one.
On the one hand, they feel that many topics have been written by their predecessors, and the space for new topics and new research is getting narrower and narrower. In this case, many ** have a great similarity, just use the old wine in a new bottle, or even almost identical, just change the word order and words.
In 2021, the topic of an article by student Wu of the first master's degree is exactly the same as that of student Feng in 2014, which is exactly the same as that of student Feng, which is "Research on the Pragmatic Ability Cultivation Strategy of Business English from the Perspective of Cross-cultural Communication Theory".
What's even more outrageous is that the content of the two ** articles is almost the same, but the expressions are different, such as "to strengthen students' pragmatic business English ability under the theory of cross-cultural communication" is replaced by "want to effectively improve students' business English ability", which is just a play on words. This is a journal**, and if you graduate**, the student may be directly judged as "academic misconduct".
On the other hand, some students have been studying a topic for a long time, and the article is almost formed, only to find that others have already published relevant **, and then they may only be able to change one direction, which is really difficult.
But no matter how difficult it is, there are still people who will continue to innovate and constantly refresh the cognition of the academic community, such as Wang Wei's graduation article "Why She Changed Her Tutor".
This ** was written in 2017, and it suddenly became popular this year, and has been ** more than 30,000 times so far, and many people rush to read it.
How new is it?First of all, the title gives people a refreshing feeling, not routine, very fresh, and also has a breath of life, which makes people want to be a ** after all.
Secondly, the catalog is eye-catching. The subheadings have the style of **, which is vivid and interesting. Like "encountering 'dismounting'", it is full of storytelling, not at all like the style of "traditional"**;And the "pale honeymoon period" directly reminds people of various bosses**, or the story of Cinderella's counterattack;"I was really stupid at the time", if anyone started Xianglin's sister-in-law's nagging, the fate must be quite bumpy, and it will make people inexplicably nervous. Everyone thinks these titles are very fascinating, and the author has the potential to write **.
Also, the previous part of the content is indeed as gripping as the storyline. The author uses interviews to restore the matter of a graduate student A in a university "changing tutors", the story has suspense, ups and downs, and is very realistic, reflecting the plight of students, and also revealing the reality of the difficult relationship between some students and tutors. This kind of topic selection and writing are different from the general **.
This ** has a total of 89 pages, and the first 30 pages are all this kind of "gossip" content.
Looking at this **, netizens were shocked and reacted very enthusiastically.
I just finished reading it last night, and it was so wonderful that I ate two packets of potato chips", "A big shock, a big shock, is this kind of ** written for fun or really passed the defense", "Science student said that the master of arts ** can actually be like this", there are too many comments like this.
Some people disagree, saying that this is the academic version of "electronic mustard", which means that the article is not rigorous enough, more than ridicule, only suitable for after-dinner entertainment, not on the table, and has no academic value. Others questioned this, saying, "This can also be graduated."
But many people retorted, saying that although this topic is not "**, but the content is actually very professional, the author is also a master of education, through this article to study the problems between master and tutor education, this article can be regarded as serious**.
It is said that this is a normative qualitative study**, and the early interview data is mostly presented in this way, while the current qualitative research will be coded with nvivo, supplemented by data analysis.
A large amount of space in the article points out that the tutor access system is solidified and closed, and the tutor evaluation subject is single.
First, the lack of awareness of the main responsibility of the tutor and other problems, but also analyzed the reasonable relationship between the tutor and the student. In the current situation of frequent incidents related to mentors, this ** still has its value, at least a wake-up call for some tutors and academic circles.
Having said that, it's really hard to innovate, and it's even harder to write an article that is innovative and has real value. I hope that college tutors and the ** system can continue to maintain openness and inclusiveness, and give students room to play, so that college students don't have to be confined to a small world and struggle to find a topic and can't write anything.
At present, the Ministry of Education and colleges and universities have quite strict requirements for graduation, and plagiarism generally cannot pass the test. Therefore, no matter how difficult it is to innovate, we must also create independently.
What do you think?
*From the Internet, invaded and deleted, thank you. ）