Recently, a case concerning financial aid for studying abroad has attracted widespread attention. The 25-year-old Tian had a conflict with his parents, and later filed a lawsuit against them because his parents refused to fund his study abroad expenses. The case sparked heated discussions among netizens, with many calling their parents' behavior "white-eyed wolves". Below, I will give you a detailed introduction to the process of the case and the different views of netizens.
Xiao Tian is the only daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Tian and owns a joint property in Baoshan District. When Oda was 16 years old, the property was jointly owned by Mr. and Mrs. Tian and Oda. However, due to problems such as studying abroad and choosing a job, Oda had a conflict with his parents and began to live alone in a rented house. Oda wanted to divide the co-owned property, but her parents refused** or bought her share of the property. Later, Mr. and Mrs. Tian and Xiao Tian signed an "Agreement", agreeing to give up the property** after the death of Xiao Tian's grandmother and distribute the house payment proportionally.
However, Oda believes that her parents are unwilling to fund her study abroad expenses, and she makes a request to divide the property. In 2021, she sued Mr. and Mrs. Tian in court, demanding the division of the property and ordering her parents to pay the discount.
At the trial, the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Tian, argued that the property was jointly owned by the three and there was no reason to divide it. They also said that in the past few years, they have been helping Xiao Tian pay off his debts and pay various expenses, with a cumulative amount of more than 500,000 yuan. In addition, they actively contacted the study abroad school for Oda, but Oda refused because he was not satisfied with the school's ranking. At the moment, they are also unable to pay for the discount of the property.
After the trial by the Baoshan District People's Court, the court held that there was no agreement or statutory situation for the division of the co-owned property. First of all, after the plaintiff defendant acquired the property, the family relationship of the three did not change, and the loss of the common foundation was not satisfied. Second, the reasons put forward by Oda were not sufficiently substantiated, and even if they existed, they were not material reasons for the need for division. In the end, the actual occupant of the original property was Xiao Tian's grandmother, and the two parties agreed to wait until the grandmother died before discussing the real estate ** issue. Because both parties are currently unable to pay the other party's discount, the property is not yet suitable for subdivision. In summary, the Baoshan District People's Court rejected Xiao Tian's claim.
Oda appealed against this verdict, but the second instance upheld the first-instance verdict. The handling of the case has aroused heated discussions among the majority of netizens. Some netizens said that it is natural for parents to treat their children selflessly, and accused Mr. and Mrs. Tian of refusing to fund Xiaotian's study abroad expenses. They believe that parents should be responsible for their children's growth and development, and should not use real estate as a bargaining chip. Others questioned Oda's decision, arguing that she should work hard to earn money on her own instead of relying on her parents.
However, some netizens agreed with the court's decision. They believe that parents are not obligated to sponsor their children's study abroad expenses, and that children should pay for their own expenses. In addition, they believed that Mr. and Mrs. Tian had already actively provided financial help to Xiao Tian and there was no need to pay additional discounts.
This case sparked me thinking about family responsibilities and growing up independently. As parents, they should do their best to help and support their children, but this does not mean that they are obligated to fund their children's study abroad expenses without restrictions. Everyone should learn to be independent and self-reliant, and work hard for their dreams and goals.
In this case, I believe there is a problem of miscommunication between parents and children. The parties did not reach an agreement, which led to the occurrence of a dispute. Parents should respect their children's choices and decisions, but at the same time, children should also understand and respect their parents' limitations and considerations. Communication and understanding between family members is the basis for building a harmonious relationship.
In addition, I also believe that the court's decision is reasonable. The court made its judgment in accordance with the relevant legal provisions and did not take sides. People should respect the impartiality and authority of the law, and should neither hope that the law will solve all problems, nor can they lose trust in the law.
The above is a detailed description and analysis of the case of a woman who accused her parents of refusing to sponsor her study abroad. This case has sparked extensive discussion and reflection in society. In family relationships, communication and understanding between parents and children is crucial. At the same time, children should also learn to be independent and strive for their dreams. The court's judgment is based on the fairness and authority of the law and deserves to be respected and obeyed. I hope you can get some inspiration from this case, build a harmonious family relationship, and pursue your dreams.