In world history, the tragedy and misery of nations often stem from excessive illusions, especially in the face of great powers. In modern times, China was caught in this predicament, and its illusions with the West led to a lack of resolute action, which was eventually defused by the West at a heavy cost. However, at the moment, Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Ali Khamenei's illusions about the United States are thought-provoking, and whether his hesitation and evasion will lead to a similar fate
Iran, a high-profile Middle Eastern country, whose leader Ayatollah Ali Ali Khamenei has long been a figure of incomprehension in the West. The hard-line attitude he displayed when he was Iran's **, in stark contrast to the image of a reformist who later became the supreme leader, left many mysteries for the outside world. However, through the performance of recent years, it is not difficult to see that Khamenei has always harbored some kind of illusion about the United States.
In recent history, Khamenei has played a bewildering role in Iran's internal politics. In the past, he was a representative of the hardliners, but now he oscillates between reformers and conservatives. The change is elusive, especially when it comes to the United States, where his attitude is even more capricious.
For more than a decade, Khamenei's illusions about the United States have been unleashed. Even in the case of the disqualification of Ahmadinejad Ahmadinejad**, Khamenei did not choose to clash head-on with the United States, but chose to solve the problem by thundering and raining. Even in the face of the assassination of senior military officer Soleimani by the United States, Khamenei did not take radical measures, and in the end the problem was closed.
This weak response raises questions about whether Khamenei really dares to have a showdown with the United States, and whether he really has no illusions about the United StatesEspecially at a time when Iran is under maximum pressure from the United States, its oil revenues are almost wiped out, and its country is in trouble, Khamenei still wants to improve relations with the West, especially the United States.
However, reality brutally reveals Khamenei's fantasies. Seeing Iran's weakness, the United States mercilessly tore up the Iran nuclear deal and encircled Iran even more severely. This is exactly what the illusion is, and Khamenei's weakness has led to harsher treatment.
For Khamenei, the most critical question is whether it is necessary to abandon illusions in the United States and decisively adopt a strategy of putting death on the line. There can be hope only if there are no illusions. If Iran can stand firm against the United States and not be afraid to fight to the death, then the United States will naturally be deterred and return to the negotiating table. However, Khamenei still seems to have illusions about the United States, so he does not dare to take a hard-line approach, or even let Ahmadinejad come to power.
Inside Iran, in order to maintain relations with the United States, Khamenei even took the move to pull down Ahmadinejad, pulling him up and putting him in prison. The move shows that Khamenei would rather weaken hard-line forces at home than tear up with the United States. This is undoubtedly a heavy blow to the Iranian people who are in trouble.
Iran is currently facing great difficulties, with oil revenues almost nil and a difficult life at home. However, Khamenei still seems to have hopes of improving relations with the West, especially with the United States. He tried to defuse the crisis diplomatically through Rouhani and others, but the United States took a tougher stance against Iran's weakness.
Perhaps, for Khamenei, the real hope lies in giving up illusions about the United States, daring to face reality and acting decisively. Iran will be able to remain invincible in the international arena only if it has no illusions. Otherwise, continued illusions could lead to even more serious consequences, leaving Iran in a difficult position to extricate itself from.
At this challenging time, Khamenei needs to re-examine his strategy and abandon unrealistic expectations of the United States. Only under such a premise will Iran be able to find a foothold in international relations and achieve true independence and strength. Otherwise, continuing to harbor illusions could lead Iran to a deeper predicament and pay a heavier price.
The article ** Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's illusions about the United States and the consequences that such illusions can lead to. On this issue, I think Khamenei's ambivalence and Iran's predicament are both worthy of deep consideration.
First, the article mentions Khamenei's changes and vacillations, especially after his assumption of the supreme leader. This is indeed a remarkable phenomenon that perhaps indicates the complexity of the power struggle within Iran. However, I think it may also be the result of Khamenei's attempt to find a suitable strategy in the face of international pressure. Different periods require different treatments, but it also makes it difficult for the outside world to understand his true intentions.
Second, the article highlights Khamenei's fantasies about the United States, especially in the face of extreme American pressure. This fantasy may stem from his memories of past historical events or from some misunderstanding of American internal politics. However, it also raises questions about whether Khamenei is really under illusions, or whether he is deliberately vague in the diplomatic arena in order to better manage domestic affairs. This is essential to understand the intentions of the Iranian leadership.
The article also touched on Khamenei's attitude towards Ahmadinejad, arguing that his reluctance to bring Ahmadinejad to power was motivated by illusions about the United States. This intrigues me because whether leaders trust and support the hardliners determines to some extent the direction of the country. However, it could also be a difficult choice for Khamenei to choose between balancing domestic interests and diplomatic pressure.
Finally, the article focuses on Iran's current predicament and international pressures. In this regard, I believe that Khamenei does face a difficult choice: whether to continue to harbor illusions about the United States or to act more decisively. For Iran, the gap between reality and fantasy can lead to a passive position in international affairs.
Overall, the article's analysis of Khamenei reveals some concerns. However, we still need more information and in-depth research to better understand the decision-making mechanisms of the Iranian leadership and the strategic direction of the country. This is a complex and sensitive topic, and it is also an important topic in international relations.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!