Recently, the cold research author team-Demon Mullah revealed the truth about the fiasco of the Duke of Burgundy's "Charles the Daring". Through the long river of history, we find that he was defeated in three fierce battles with the Swiss Confederation, how could he fall so bizarrely?Was it the triple contest of artillery, strategy, or fate that caused this proud son of heaven to return in embarrassment?
A Crossroads in History: The Rise of the Bold Charlie.
Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy in Europe in the late 15th century, was born at the end of the Hundred Years' War between England and France. At the time of his birth, the Duchy of Burgundy had annexed the rich coastal regions and was powerful. The war has not yet subsided, and Charles the Bold is facing an era full of opportunities and challenges, which can be described as a crossroads in history.
Tactics are the opposite of stereotypes.
Charlie the Bold suffered a fiasco, and people generally blamed him for relying too much on artillery, believing that it was not lethal enough at the time. However, the cold research team believes that this judgment is too rigid. Since the invention of firearms, the artillery equipment of the first team has been gradually improving, rather than lacking in performance.
Battle of the Lance and Armor-Piercing: A Reversal of Truth.
Overcoming stereotypes, we find that pikemen play a key role in defending against cavalry onslaught in spear and fire tactics. And in the battle with the old Swiss Confederacy, the Swiss spearmen charged with ease, and the battle situation was unexpected by everyone.
The value of artillery units: an advanced move that cannot be ignored.
The artillery unit of the bold Charlie was not blindly advancing, but actively responding to the new situation of the war. His emphasis on artillery allowed his army to excel in field and siege warfare. Rather than being the cause of failure, it should be seen as a far-sighted and advanced move.
The Chain Reaction of Strategic Blunders: The Battle of Grançon Revealed.
Charles the Bold made a fatal strategic mistake in the Battle of Grançon. He executed all the defenders who surrendered after the fall of the city, but instead of intimidating the Swiss, he provoked their hatred. This strategic mistake became the trigger for defeat.
The intricacies of the battle: the Battle of Vamarcus Heights.
In the battle of Vamarcus Heights, Charles the Bold did not dare to attack with all his strength at both ends, resulting in confusion on the battle line. He tried to strike the Swiss phalanx with long-range artillery, but failed to take full advantage of the artillery. Eventually, the chaos in the army caused the Swiss to turn the tables and lose their treasure and military resources.
The key to the battle situation: the confusion of fate.
Charlie the Bold's cascading blunders in three battles reveal the importance of environmental factors in military decision-making. From Grançon City to Vamarcus Heights, the formation and terrain of the environment became a source of confusion for his fate, preventing him from stabilizing the battle and eventually leading to a rout.
The unpredictable ending: the fall of Charlie the Bold.
Charles the Bold fled the battlefield in a hurry, leaving behind unpaid salaries, looted treasure, and all sorts of artillery. After the Swiss army saw these treasures, they stopped pursuing, and in the end Charlie the Bold army only lost about 1,000 men, but these treasures became an important military expense for the Swiss.
Reflecting on the wisdom of history: the details of military decision-making that cannot be overlooked.
The downfall of Charlie the Bold is a complex historical picture. Artillery, strategy, formation, environment and other factors converged in an instant to determine his fate. History tells us that in military decision-making, consideration of details and sensitivity to the environment often determine the final victory.
Epilogue. Charlie the Bold's downfall was not a spur of the moment or a simple mistake, but the result of a confluence of factors. Historical experience tells us that military decision-making requires thinking about the overall situation and paying attention to details in order to remain invincible in the war situation. This former proud son of heaven left an indelible mark of defeat on the battlefield of the Swiss Confederation, and also left us with deep reflection.
The article profoundly analyzes the reasons for the defeat of the Duke of Burgundy, "Charles the Brave", in the three battles with the Swiss Confederation, and shows the author's deep understanding of history and calm and objective views through the analysis of historical events one by one. First of all, through the introduction of the background of the era of Charles the Bold, the article enables readers to better understand the war situation in Europe at that time, and lays a solid foundation for subsequent analysis.
In the reasons for Charlie the Bold's failure, the article makes a dialectical reflection on traditional stereotypes, especially the analysis of the role and practical effects of artillery, so that readers have a clearer understanding of some misconceptions about artillery in history. This questioning and in-depth analysis of traditional views demonstrates the author's ability to think independently and have a deep understanding of historical events.
In addition, the article provides a detailed analysis of tactical and strategic mistakes, pointing out the tactical mistakes of Charles the Bold in the two battles of Grançon City and Vamarcus Heights, including the execution of the defenders in the city and the improper use of artillery. Such an analysis not only helps the reader better understand the course of historical events, but also reflects the author's in-depth insight into military tactics.
The article also enables readers to form a vivid picture of the battlefield in their minds through detailed descriptions of the battle, and better feel the tragedy and intensity of the war at that time. This vivid description enhances the reader's reading experience and makes historical events more concrete and realistic.
Finally, the article concludes with a reflection on the wisdom of history, emphasizing the importance of sensitivity to detail and circumstances in military decision-making. This kind of ending not only echoes the historical background introduction at the beginning of the article, but also leaves a profound inspiration for the reader, allowing people to reflect on history and better appreciate the human factors and complexities in it.
Overall, this commentary** provides an insightful interpretation of the historical analysis presented in the article, and through detailed discussion and reasonable structure, the reader can better understand the reasons for Charlie the Bold's failure, and draw wisdom from historical reflection.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!