The New Year is approaching, and the New Year is sad. On the evening of December 14, two ST shares of less than one yuan announced separately that they were likely to be terminated by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
ST Oceanwide announced that on December 14, the company's price was lower than 1 yuan for 11 consecutive trading days. In accordance with Article 9 of the Listing Rules of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange2.Article 1 stipulates that if the company's price is lower than 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, the company's price will be terminated by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
ST Bolong announced on December 14 that as of December 14, 2023, the company's *** price has been lower than 1 yuan share for 12 consecutive trading days. According to the regulations, if the company's price is lower than 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, the company's price will be terminated by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
Previously, on December 12, *ST Huayi announced that the stock price was below 1 yuan for the 11th consecutive trading day, closing at 058 yuan shares, lock in the par value in advance and delist. On the evening of the same day, *ST Huayi issued an announcement to remind the risk: the company's ** price has been lower than RMB 1 for 11 consecutive trading days, and even if the price limit is lower than RMB 1 for the next 9 consecutive trading days, it will also hit the trading delisting indicator because the stock price is below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days. In the future, the Shanghai Stock Exchange will make a decision to terminate the listing of the company's ** within 15 trading days, and the company** will not enter the delisting period.
In addition to the stock price continuing**, the company also has material violations. *ST Huayi previously announced that the company received the "Prior Notice of Administrative Punishment" issued by the Zhejiang Supervision Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission on November 21. According to the Notice, there were false records in the company's annual reports from 2017 to 2022. The company said that the company and the accountant have verified the impact of the false records involved in the "Notice" on the company's income, costs, expenses, net profits and other related subjects. The company's original disclosure of net profit attributable to the parent in 2016, 2018 and 2019 was negative, and after calculation, the net profit attributable to the parent company in the above years is still negative after this adjustment. The company's original disclosure of the net profit attributable to the parent in 2017 was positive, and the net profit attributable to the parent in 2017 after the adjustment was negative, specifically -8196870,000 yuan. For the net profit attributable to the parent company in 2017 turned from positive to negative, the accounting firm also issued a special explanation. It is estimated that the adjusted net profit attributable to the parent company from 2016 to 2019 is negative, which may touch the relevant provisions of the Shanghai Stock Exchange on the mandatory delisting of major violations, and the company may be forced to delist due to major violations.
Text: Beijing Youth Daily reporter Liu Shenliang.
Edited by Fan Hongwei.