The scene of the associate professor of Peking University crossing the hurdle into the school gate sparked a heated discussion among netizens. In addition to the laughter, many students also expressed their hope that colleges and universities can open their doors and return to their previous state of free entry and exit. The cause of this incident was that Li Zhi, an associate professor at the School of Engineering of Peking University, complained about the access control system at the entrance of Peking University. Although face recognition only takes more than a dozen seconds, there will still be long queues during peak hours, wasting the time of teachers and students. Moreover, not all faculty and staff have facial recognition permissions, and some also need to show a work ID, which is even more troublesome. Therefore, Professor Li chose to step directly over the railing of the turnstile on many occasions without being stopped by the guards who knew him. However, a security guard, who did not know his identity, spotted him hurdling into the school and embarked on a bicycle chase until he saw his work card. But when Professor Li left the school, he was stopped again, because he did not have facial recognition permission, so he could only "cross the hurdle" again. Professor Li believes that this is a waste of time, and it is also hard work for the janitor. This incident has sparked discussions among the majority of netizens, and many students also hope to return to the previous state of free access.
This eye-catching incident of an associate professor at Peking University "crossing the curfew" has made people reflect on the closed management of university campuses. Some people think that the entrance and exit of the school gate is for the safety of the students, but others think that the previous state of openness was more liberating. In any case, the changes to the access control system should be to better balance the safety and convenience of the campus.
After learning the news of the change in the access control system of Peking University, a professor at Tsinghua University issued a document saying that the condition of face scanning is no longer required to open the school gate, as long as the teacher drives into the school or walks out of the school, face recognition is no longer required. However, walking into the school still requires a face brush. This shows that some changes have been made to the access control system of Peking University, although it is not very large, but it is better than nothing. In this regard, a professor at Tsinghua University said that although this result has not caused a lot of discussion, it is still better than the previous practice, and it can be said that it is better than nothing compared to no change. He hoped that Peking University would maintain a free, open, inclusive, and leading atmosphere, instead of closing itself off to the outside world and restricting its own development.
In recent years, there has been a debate about the closure and openness of university campuses. Some people think that university campuses were also open to the public before, and nothing happened. But it is undeniable that there are some people who enter college campuses now without a pure purpose, they may just use such an opportunity to shoot short ** on campus, turning the college campus into a *** password. This has affected the learning atmosphere of students to a certain extent. Therefore, maintaining the learning atmosphere on university campuses and reducing the entry and exit of outsiders can ensure that students can concentrate on their studies and ensure their safety.
However, the closed management also brings certain inconveniences to the entry and exit of teachers and students. The debate over the closure and opening of university campuses ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of each school. Colleges and universities have always maintained a policy of not lifting the lockdown and strictly managing outsiders, which is the responsibility of internal teachers and students. After all, we have seen some incidents of outsiders beating students after entering the school. Closed management ensures a certain level of safety for students and allows them to focus on their studies. Therefore, when it comes to access control management on university campuses, both security and student development need to be fully considered.
Personally, I think college campuses should be open. As a temple of freedom and knowledge, a university campus should provide an open learning environment for students to explore and learn freely. And this kind of openness does not mean laissez-faire, but requires a certain amount of management and security guarantees. Therefore, in the design of the access control system, there are measures that can be taken to balance the freedom and security of students. For example, a facial recognition system can be used to allow legitimate teachers and students to enter and exit the campus conveniently, reduce queuing time, and add some special permissions to improve the efficiency of faculty and staff. At the same time, the management of outsiders should be strengthened to limit their access to ensure that the learning environment for students is not disturbed.
All in all, the closure and opening of university campuses requires a trade-off between safety and student development. Closed management can ensure the safety and learning atmosphere of students, but it will also bring certain inconvenience to teachers and students. Therefore, the design of the access control system should focus on balance, taking into account safety and convenience, so that students can pursue knowledge exploration and growth in a free, open, safe and orderly campus environment.