The dispute between Zhu Dan and his ex-best friend Tian Xiaomi has attracted widespread attention recently. Tian Xiaomi released a ** through lawyer Zhang Jun, claiming that the content released by Zhu Dan in Mango TV's program was completely inconsistent with the truth, which seriously affected her career and life, and asked Zhu Dan to defend her rights.
This incident has caused heated discussions and controversy on the Internet. Some netizens expressed doubts about why Tian Xiaomi entrusted a lawyer to defend her rights, thinking that she had done something disgraceful, but in turn she said goodbye. However, Tian Xiaomi's wording is confusing, she did not clearly point out that the object of rights protection is Zhu Dan, it may be Zhu Dan, or it may be some ** or self **.
What Zhu Dan said on the show was indirectly proved by legal documents to a certain extent. Tian Xiaomi, as a third party and defendant, has no history of failing to participate in the litigation between Zhu Dan and Beijing Pincheng Yuehui Culture Communication Company. In addition, she was also listed as a dishonest person subject to execution by the court, involving an amount of about 16 million yuan, but she has not yet been successfully executed. The facts of these economic disputes are clear, so it is not easy for Tian Xiaomi to win against Zhu Dan.
Although Zhu Dan did not directly name and accuse her of who deceived her in the show, Tian Xiaomi took the initiative to stand up and take a seat, indirectly acknowledging that she had deceived her friends. This kind of behavior is a bit puzzling, because unless there is evidence to prove that Zhu Dan lied, it will be difficult for Tian Xiaomi to successfully bring down Zhu Dan. As for the netizens who spread false news, if they do exist, Tian Xiaomi can also choose to take legal action against them.
The whole incident had a certain impact on society. First of all, Zhu Dan's reputation may have been damaged to some extent. Even if it was later proved that Tian Xiaomi did not succeed in defending her rights, the bad comments related to this incident have already had a negative impact on her image. Secondly, the incident once again sparked a discussion about the self-leading industry. The rapid development of self-development, but also faced with false news, directional reports and other problems, this incident also increased the public's doubts and vigilance against self-development.
As of now, no update on the development of the incident is known. But regardless of the outcome, the incident is a reminder of the respect for the authenticity of information and the privacy of individuals. For Zichuang, the published content should be objectively and truthfully verified, and the rights and interests of others should be respected to avoid similar incidents from happening again.
Finally, as a reader, what do you think is the impact of this incident on society?In the industry, how to ensure the authenticity and reliability of information?Please leave your comments and thoughts to discuss with us.