Since the author's article ".OctoberAfter its publication, it aroused heated discussions and controversy among many readers. Click-through rateMore than 120,000 times, but almost all of the 240 of those readers' replies were classified as ".Yellow jokes"No, it's notPoetry。This repercussions begs the question of what these works belong toPoetry, the story is stillYellow jokesWhat about it?What do readers see and feel from it?This begs the bigger question of whether the publication is promoting truth, goodness and beauty, or vice versa, and what the editors' motivations are for writing. In order to clarify these doubts and allow readers to improve their level of appreciation, the author believes that ".Octobershould give an explanation to the reader.
1. The author's motivation for writing
PoetryIt is a discipline that expresses emotions and thoughtsArtForm is also a medium for transmitting positive energy. However, in theOctoberIn these works, it is difficult for readers to feel any positive energy. It's not so much promoting truth, goodness and beauty, it's more like showing the "glorious image" of a greasy man. This makes the reader question, the editor is so **orientedPoetryWhat is it for?If the editor thinks that the level of readers is low, then should they come out and explain it, so that everyone can improve their appreciation level, so as to better support the ".October
Of course, that's not to sayPoetryNo sexual or physical depictions are allowed. Sex and the body can also be seen as an image of a poem, butCriticalIt is whether the writer knows how to use the imagery and what the purpose is. A good writer is able to express sexuality and body in a unique and profound way that keeps the reader inPoetryI feel beautiful and real. However, in theOctoberIn addition to suffering from greasy languageNoiseOutside, it's hard to find anything that can be called beautiful. Therefore, the reader hopes that ".Octobercan give a clear explanation of the motivation and intent behind these works.
2. Evaluation and analysis of works
In this work, a kiss between two young lovers in the mountains and forests is described. However, in the process of kissing, the male protagonist kept trying to open the heroine's jeans. The heroine shows an ambivalent attitude, wanting to be intimate with the male protagonist, but resisting the male protagonist's behavior, and finally ends the relationship with a proud refusal and declaration.
This description is full of sexual innuendo and ambiguous language, making it difficult for the reader to ignore the vulgarity and kitsch in it. At the same time, the work fails to convey positive energy or provoke the reader to think about love and youth. This makes the reader deeply puzzled, what kind of inspiration and resonance can such a work bring them?
It is worth mentioning that this is not the author's only work. Due to space limitations, it is not possible to make a detailed analysis of each of them, but it is certain that ",OctoberThere are similar problems with these works as a whole. Readers are looking forward to more positive energy and reflections from it, not just a greasy oneYellow jokes
3. Hot comments from netizens
In ".OctoberAfter the work was published, a large number of readers left their own comments. Their evaluation of these works can be described as varied.
Some consider these works to be pureYellow jokes, lack of realArtSex and depth of thought. They believe that the author will be called elegantArtreduced to vulgar and vulgar expressions. These comments are generally opposed, expressing disappointment and dissatisfaction with such a work.
However, there are also some readers who have expressed their approval of these works. They find the works to be imaginative and emotional, to resonate with their readers, and to constantly provoke thought and discussion. For these readers, ".Octoberis not onlyYellow jokes, but a unique oneArtform andExpressions
Whether it's for or against, ".Octoberhave aroused readers' interest in itPoetrywithYellow jokesof thoughts. This controversy is also the case for theOctoberprovides an opportunity to reflect on and adjust its positioning and communication to better meet the needs of its readers.
Based on the above observations and analysis, the author believes that ".Octobershould indeed give the reader an explanation. As a state-run publication, its purpose is to promote truth, goodness and beauty, and to provide readers with positive informationCultureProducts. However, ".OctoberThe work does not achieve the desired effect in this regard, lacking the real oneArtSexual and positive energy.
In order to better respond to the expectations of readers, the author recommends ".OctoberBe more cautious and thoughtful when requesting manuscripts and editing works. Be clear about the motivation and purpose of the work, and convey the positive through excellent workValuesand thoughts. Only in this way, ".OctoberIn order to win the trust and support of readers, and realize their own development and value.
From this article, we can see that there is subjectivity and diversity in the evaluation of literary and artistic works. Different people may have completely different perceptions and feelings about the same thing. Therefore, as authors and creators, we should pay more attention to the needs and expectations of readers, and respond to readers' questions and doubts with careful creation and in-depth thinking.
At the same time, we should also reflect on our appreciation of literary and artistic works and improve our appreciation ability. Don't be easily confused by superficial **, and be good at digging out the deep information and meaning behind the work. It is only through constant thinking and exploration that we can better understand and appreciateArtworks, truly appreciate the beauty and wisdom they contain.