Many people may not know that the terrible power of nuclear ** is actually seriously overestimated. Newspapers and magazines in the past claimed that the United States and the Soviet Union possessed tens of thousands of nuclear weapons** enough to destroy the planet dozens of times. But is this the real situation or an exaggerated crisis rhetoric?
At one time, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, and the yield of the "Little Boy" was 150,000 tons, causing a total of 200,000 deaths, and the equivalent of the "fat man" is 20,000 tons, resulting in 60,000 deaths. However, the tens of thousands of hydrogen bombs that were created later, with a yield of tens of millions of tons, were simply multiplied by some experts, leading to an exaggeration of power. In fact, the lethality of these nuclear ** is far less great than it is rumored.
The truth about the nuclear bomb is revealed.
This exaggeration often stems from a misunderstanding of the power of nuclear ***. At the moment of tens of millions of tons of nuclear power, the damage caused is mainly confined to the vicinity of the explosion center, and the lethality of the nuclear power will be rapidly reduced due to the shelter of the terrain and buildings far away from the explosion center. In fact, the lethality of a hydrogen bomb of tens of millions of tons on a city is equivalent to less than ten "little boys", and far from thousands of times as rumored.
During the Cold War, the United States had more than 20,000 nuclear weapons, while the Soviet Union had more than 30,000. However, only about one-third of them are strategic nuclear **, which can be used to drop strategic missiles on enemy territory, and the rest are tactical nuclear **, which cannot be directly delivered to enemy territory and can only be used when the army fights. In the event of a war, the primary goal of both sides is to eliminate each other's strategic nuclear weapons and nuclear vehicles in order to prevent a nuclear strike by the other side.
Reconstruction and recovery after nuclear war.
The consequences of a nuclear war are actually far less pessimistic than one might think. Within 14 days of the bomb**, the damage from nuclear radiation had been significantly reduced, and the country began to recover and rebuild. In the event of a nuclear attack, third- and fourth-tier cities and rural areas will generally not be subjected to a nuclear attack, and residents of large cities will also take refuge in bomb shelters and subways as soon as possible, so that half of the population of the nuclear power is expected to survive. Decades ago, China implemented the "three fronts" of construction large and small, precisely based on the understanding of the law of recovery after nuclear war.
Although nuclear power is not as terrible as people think in their hearts, it is still the world's most powerful and relatively low-cost nuclear power, and it is the cornerstone of strong military strength, which must not be underestimated.
Summary: Correct understanding of nuclear **.
The fact that the true power of nuclear ** is exaggerated exists, and we need to understand it correctly. There is no need to be overly fearful and to exaggerate the military power of the nuclear superpower. Only by taking a rational view of nuclear weapons can we better maintain peace and stability.
This article profoundly explores the actual power of nuclear bombs and reveals that there is a certain misunderstanding of the impact of nuclear bombs. Through the analysis of the history and the situation of the nuclear arsenal during the Cold War, as well as reasonable speculation about the recovery and reconstruction after the nuclear war, the author proposes a more objective attitude towards nuclear weapons.
First of all, the article focuses on the exaggeration of the power of nuclear **, taking the atomic bomb dropped by the United States in Japan as an example, revealing the ** situation at that time, and by comparing the yield of the later hydrogen bomb, it refutes the statement that "tens of thousands of nuclear ** can destroy the earth dozens of times". This exaggeration mainly stems from a misunderstanding of the power of nuclear ***, and through scientific explanations, readers can better understand the actual killing range of nuclear ***.
Second, the article analyzes the composition of the nuclear arsenals of the nuclear powers during the Cold War, emphasizing that the strategic nuclear arsenal is mainly used to attack the opponent's nuclear arsenal, rather than to bomb enemy cities extensively. This is important to explain why nuclear power has failed to destroy the nuclear powers, and to give a clearer picture of the reality of nuclear war.
The article also makes reasonable guesses about the recovery and reconstruction after the nuclear war, emphasizing the possibility that the damage from nuclear radiation will rapidly decrease within 14 days after the nuclear bomb**, and the country will begin to rebuild. This rational analysis helps to dispel stereotypes about the post-nuclear apocalypse and convinces the reader that even in the event of a nuclear war, there is a certain chance of survival.
Finally, the article summarizes the position of nuclear power in the country's military strength, emphasizing its importance as the most powerful and relatively low-cost nuclear power. This summary gives people a more comprehensive understanding of nuclear power, no longer overstating its threat, and at the same time not ignoring its place in the country.
Taken together, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the true power and impact of nuclear ** through scientific explanations and reasonable speculation. Through the observation of history and reality, readers can look at nuclear ** more rationally, and understand that its threat to mankind can be controlled and reduced rationally. Such a view would help to promote a rational perception of nuclear weapons in order to better maintain global peace and security.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!