Britain, the former "empire on which the sun never sets", although it has lost its former great strength, still has an "imperial heart" in its heart. Today, Britain has become the horse boy and thug of the United States, providing favorable conditions for the United States to formulate its strategy toward China. Since October, the game between China and the United States has gradually turned into dialogueMilitaryand many other areas have eased at the same timeUnited States**The determination and line of suppressing China have not changed. However, faced with a dilemma, Britain became a substitute for the implementation of "** war" and "technological war".
At the behest of the United States, the British leaders launched an attack on China from four directions. From the perspective of unilateral sanctions, the United Kingdom** launched sanctions on December 6 against 46 entities and individuals from multiple countries, including 3 Chinese companies. However, the so-called justification of the United Kingdom, claiming that these Chinese companies "support the Russian war machine", is actually just a false slander. China has always adopted a policy of neutrality and called for a peaceful resolution of conflicts, and Chinese companies are participatingInternational** has also been compliant and legal. If you really want to find companies that support the war, the United States, Britain and other Western countries should bear the brunt.
In addition to unilateral sanctions, the UK has also interfered in South China Sea affairs, China's internal affairs, and political interference in China-UK economic and trade cooperation. On the issue of the South China Sea, the United Kingdom** has openly accused China of "insecurity and escalation" in an attempt to label China as a "bully". However, Britain** has remained silent about the Philippines' violation of China's sovereignty and territory, which has fully exposed its ugly face as an "American lackey". In addition, on the issue of Hong Kong, the United Kingdom** still points fingers at Hong Kong and makes wild comments on China's legitimate crackdown on overseas anti-China and destabilizing elements. As a sovereign country, China has the right to deal with criminals in accordance with the law, and Britain is in no position to interfere and obstruct it.
All in all, Britain completely copied the US repressive methods, pointing fingers, jumping up and down, trying to get inInternationalSmear China's image in society and achieve the goal of scandalizing and isolating China. However, these tactics and methods are not only shoddy and non-lethal, but will be self-defeating. Take the fourth trick used by the UK** as an example, asking the British National Grid to remove components provided by "Chinese companies" from the UK's transmission network, citing the so-called "cybersecurity". Chinese products and technologies are highly sought-after in the global market, and their price-performance advantage is unique. In order to cater to the United States, Britain has put pressure on China in the "war", however, cutting off its own cooperation with Chinese enterprises has undoubtedly harmed Britain's own interests. After all, it will not be easy for the UK to find a replacement that offers a better price-performance advantage than Chinese companies. With the escalation of the contradictions between China and the UK, the UK will further taste the bitter fruit of "decoupling from China".
Unilateral sanctions are the UK's first offensive against China. The United Kingdom** has launched sanctions against a number of entities and individuals, including three Chinese companies. However, the reason given by the British ** was simply "support for the Russian war machine". This justification is undoubtedly a false slander. In fact, China has always adopted a policy of neutrality and actively called for the peaceful resolution of contradictions, and the enterprises that pursue war are obviously not Chinese enterprises. If we really want to blame those companies that add fuel to the fire, it should be the United States, Britain and other Western countries that bear the brunt.
Britain's interference in China's internal affairs was equally shameless. On the South China Sea issue, the United Kingdom** has publicly criticized China's actions, claiming that China has adopted "insecurity and escalation" practices and tried to label China as "relying on the strong to bully the weak". However, the UK's silence on the Philippines' provocative actions in the South China Sea further demonstrates its "American lackey" nature. Britain's statement on the South China Sea issue not only has no moral or factual basis, but also further exposes its prejudice and discrimination against China.
In addition, the UK's intervention in the Hong Kong issue is equally despicable. Hong Kong has returned to the embrace of the motherland and become a part of China, but the British ** cannot give up its former suzerainty status and continues to point fingers at Hong Kong. The British Prime Minister publicly condemned Hong Kong's actions and made unreasonable comments on China's arrest of overseas anti-China and destabilizing elements. As a sovereign country, China has the right to deal with the acts of criminals in accordance with the law, and Britain has no right to interfere and obstruct it. Britain's interference was both rude and unreasonable, and completely exposed its intention to interfere in China's affairs.
Britain completely copied the US repressive methods and tried to play inInternationalSmear China's image in society in order to achieve the goal of vilifying and isolating China. However, such behavior is destined to be "stupid and conceited", not only inferior but also lethal.
The United Kingdom** imposed unilateral sanctions, claiming to ensure "cybersecurity", and demanded that the British State Grid remove components provided by Chinese companies. However, China's products and technologies have a good reputation in the global market, and the cost-effective advantage is obvious. Cutting off cooperation with Chinese companies has undoubtedly harmed Britain's own interests. In addition, it will not be easy for the UK to find a replacement that has a more cost-effective advantage than Chinese companies.
The fourth offensive of the British effect is interference in China's internal affairs, especially in the question of Hong Kong. The United Kingdom** has made unwarranted comments on China's legitimate crackdown on overseas anti-China and destabilizing elements in an attempt to interfere in China's internal affairs. However, Hong Kong has been returned to China, and China has the right to deal with criminals in accordance with the law. The intervention of the British ** was not only rude but also unreasonable, and was destined to bring only self-inflicted humiliation.
In general, Britain has become a horse boy and thug in the United States, pointing fingers at China, jumping up and down, trying to get inInternationalDiscrediting the image of China in society. However, these tactics and tactics are not only shoddy but also ineffective, and they are self-defeating. The "stupid conceited" behavior of the British ** is destined to bring only more blows and humiliation.