Headline: Belarus responds to Western accusations, calling the Ryan airliner incident a response to a terrorist threat.
Introduction: At the press conference on the same day, Belarus responded to the "illegal crackdown" and "air piracy" of Western countries against them. However, the BBC reporter left the table because of "no surprise", which sparked controversy. At the press conference, the arrested opposition figures were present but were accused of being "involuntary". Belarus accused the journalists of double standards and expressed the expectation that they would do the same in the UK.
Text: At a press conference held by the Belarusian Parliamentary Center a few days ago, journalists from various countries and heads of relevant departments gathered together to discuss the causes and consequences of the "Ryan airliner" incident and the latest developments, in response to the accusations of Western countries against Belarus. However, the BBC reporter left the meeting angrily because he did not get the "fierce news", which was regarded as "dissatisfaction" with Belarus.
According to the head of the Belarusian Air Force department, the Ryan airliner was not intercepted in Belarusian airspace. During the flight, only one armed aircraft flew in the air below a kilometer, at least 9,000 meters away from the Ryanairliner. It wasn't until the airliner was about to land that the Air Force fighter jets arrived in nearby airspace to prevent emergencies.
BBC reporters obviously could not give a "shocking" report on the explanations and evidence provided by the Belarusian ** department. Subsequently, the group of journalists threatened to expose the so-called "truth" and demanded to put pressure on them to leave the field after being rejected. However, their threats did not have the desired effect and did not even affect the rhythm of the launch. The captured opposition figure Protasevich answered questions from journalists on the spot, stressing that there is no safer place in the world than Belarus.
Regarding the BBC reporter's exit, a Russian spokesman called it a "hypocrite" with double standards, and said that he expected to see the same behavior of the BBC reporter at a similar press conference in the UK, especially at the Assange press conference. At the press conference, it was mentioned that the relevant British authorities had arrested Assange two years ago.
The Ryan airliner incident is a continuation of the previous one. During the flight to Belarusian airspace, the crew received a local notification of a physical threat, and then the flight was rerouted to the nearest airport. Of particular concern is the fact that there were two long-wanted opposition figures on board the plane, and the ground security services had long been waiting and brought them under control. On this ground, Western countries accused Belarus of sending military equipment to intercept the flight, calling it a state-led "terrorist act".
The EU strictly prohibits any Belarusian flights from flying into its airspace, and requires all EU flights to no longer pass through Belarus in an attempt to completely "isolate" Belarus in the aviation field. In addition, the EU openly finances the opposition in Belarus and calls them "Belarusian fighters" in order to encourage them to overthrow the Belarusian Lukashenko regime. The United States also announced the reimposition of sanctions on several companies in Belarus.
Strikingly, the captured Protasevich revealed the truth of the incident in a short time. Not only did he admit to manipulating ** and inciting popular revolt**, but he also revealed the targeted conspiracy of the Ryan airliner incident and implied that he had been betrayed by Western countries.
Conclusion: Belarus responded to the incident with the Ryan airliner, calling it a response to a terrorist threat. Belarus blamed the departure of BBC journalists and their accusations against opposition figures, and would like to see the same move at a similar press conference in the UK. The incident sparked accusations and sanctions from Western countries, adding tensions between Belarus and the European Union. Future developments remain to be seen, and the truth and impact of the incident still require further investigation and analysis.