In the first test, he was criticized by manufacturers and netizens, who accused him of unfair test results, and even thought that it was a paid test. In order to clarify these doubts, the company conducted a second test and invited car companies and ** to the scene to witness. In this test, the vehicles of many car companies were tested live under the witness of ** and car companies, and the test results were consistent with the results of the first test. The consistency of these test results shows that the company did not do any special treatment during the test, which is true and fair.
Although some people have questioned the usefulness of the test in extreme cold conditions, arguing that the real car use scenario in the north will not be so cold, the test results still make sense. For car owners driving in the north, these test results give a clear recommendation not to buy an electric car as much as possible. In extreme cold conditions, the range of electric vehicles is significantly reduced, and may even be half of the original. According to the actual measurements of some car enthusiasts, in the case of more than minus 20 degrees, the cruising range of electric vehicles may only be one-fifth of the original, or even lower. This means that buying an electric vehicle in the north may not meet the needs of daily travel, and it needs to be charged frequently, causing inconvenience to users.
In addition to the problem of range, the stability of electric vehicles can also be affected by extreme cold conditions. In extremely cold weather, many electronic devices will be affected, and electric vehicles, as a type of car with more electronic devices, are more susceptible to bad weather. In contrast, traditional fuel vehicles are more stable and reliable in extreme cold conditions. This is one of the reasons why people who drive in the north are more inclined to buy a gasoline car rather than an electric vehicle.
Although there is some controversy about the criteria and conditions of this test, we can still draw a conclusion from it: driving in the north, buying a fuel car is more reliable and practical. Many cities in the north spend nearly a third of their time in temperatures below freezing, which means that vehicles that spend long periods of time outdoors must be able to cope with extreme cold. In this case, the endurance and stability of electric vehicles are significantly inferior to those of fuel vehicles. Therefore, in order to avoid the trouble of using the vehicle in the severe cold weather in the north, it is wiser to buy a fuel vehicle.
Through the test results of the Chedi and the analysis of the vehicle's performance under the extreme cold conditions in the north, I also came to a similar conclusion as the Chedi. As a car owner in the north, I deeply understand the impact of the cold climate in the north on the vehicle. I used to have an electric car, and in the winter, I often needed to go to the charging station to charge it, and the range was seriously insufficient, which caused a lot of inconvenience to my car. And some of my friends I know have gasoline vehicles, but they can use them normally in the cold weather, which makes me more inclined to buy a fuel car. Therefore, I agree with the advice of the car emperor on the issue of buying a car in the north, try not to buy an electric car, and choose a fuel car is a better choice.
To sum up, the tests proved that driving in the north, especially in extremely cold conditions, buying an electric car is not a wise choice. The range of the tram is significantly reduced, the stability is affected, and the prolonged low temperature climate in most northern cities will cause problems for the use of trams. In this case, buying a fuel car is a more reliable and practical option. However, when it comes to buying a car, everyone's needs and preferences are different, and you need to make a choice based on your specific situation. But for car owners in the north, the test of knowing the car emperor still provides an important reference.