When it comes to Made in China, people often associate it with high quality, affordable and low price. As a manufacturing powerhouse, China's creativity and pursuit of quality are appreciated by the world. Made in China not only has outstanding performance in daily necessities, but also is popular internationally.
Take the Type 63 automatic rifle made in China as an example, although this ** has been discontinued, it was once the best-selling gun in my country and became the "sweet and sweet" in the overseas market.
This gun was regarded as a treasure and a sought-after commodity abroad, however, it was abandoned not long after our army got its hands on it, what is going on?Could it be that the Type 63 rifle is only glamorous on the outside, but in fact it is not satisfactory?
In fact, the Type 63 rifle is a sophisticated firearm, as can be seen from its parametric performance. It is designed and developed on the basis of the Type 56, which improves the accuracy of the Type 56 point fire and adds some new functions.
Whether it is a single shot or a burst of fire, this gun has a lot of firepower. Although its effective range is only 400 meters, it is also capable of shooting at a distance of 800 meters.
In 1963, the first batch of Type 63 rifles was produced, which attracted the attention of overseas markets as soon as it was launched, and was even exported to Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan and other countries. To this day, some Middle Eastern countries still use the first batch of Type 63 of the original production.
However, in the seventies of the twentieth century, our army believed that this firearm had the problems of high failure rate and poor shooting accuracy, so it chose to abandon it. This decision has puzzled the outside world, after all, this gun has always been favored in the international market.
In fact, there is no doubt that the performance of this firearm is excellent, as can be seen from its first production. Otherwise, it would not have achieved millions of sales in the international market and become the envy of other countries. The problem lies in the later stage of manufacturing.
At that time, it was the "Great Leap Forward", military manufacturing was impacted, and in order to meet the large-scale production, the workers chose to simplify and improve the 63-style step structure. As a result, the Type 63 rifles produced later were inferior in quality to the original first batch. In the Vietnam War, soldiers expressed dissatisfaction with the gun due to the high failure rate and some cases of misfire and injuries.
Although the Type 63 rifle was improved and optimized again, it still could not surpass the first batch that was originally produced. With the official entry into service of the Type 81 rifle, the Type 63 rifle was honorably laid off. Despite its short service in our country, the prestige of this gun in the Middle East is still celebrated to this day.
In general, the Type 63 rifle was once an outstanding representative of Chinese manufacturing, but due to the simplification and improvement of the manufacturing process, which led to a decrease in quality, it was eventually abandoned in our army. Its glorious past is evocative, but it also reminds us that we can't ignore quality while pursuing yield, lest the brilliance hide the existence of problems.
The development process of China's Type 63 rifle is indeed a story of considerable twists and turns and profound enlightenment. The article makes a detailed analysis of its journey from glory to being abandoned by our army, which makes people think more deeply about the development and challenges of China's manufacturing industry.
First of all, the Type 63 rifle, as one of the representatives of Chinese-made, was a great success at the time of its initial launch. Its high quality and affordable characteristics have made it popular in the international market, and even become the first choice for the armies of some countries**. This fully demonstrates China's technological strength and market competitiveness in the manufacturing industry, and is also the epitome of Chinese brands emerging in the international market.
However, the article points out why the Type 63 rifle was abandoned in our army, and the main problem lies in the later manufacture. During the "Great Leap Forward", in order to cope with the needs of large-scale production, the workers chose to simplify and improve the Type 63 rifle structure, which led to a decline in the quality of the rifles produced in the later period. This phenomenon reminds us that in the process of development, the blind pursuit of quantity at the expense of product quality is a serious problem. This is not only manifested in military manufacturing, but also exists in other fields, which needs to arouse our high vigilance.
The article also mentions the performance of the Type 63 rifle in the Vietnam War, although its initial performance was superior, but due to the high failure rate and problems such as misfire and injury, it was dissatisfied by soldiers on the actual battlefield. This once again confirms the point of view that product quality is particularly important for manufacturing. In the arms race and modern warfare, the reliability of each and every one is crucial, because it is related to the life and death of every soldier on the battlefield.
Finally, the article concludes by emphasizing the importance of quality and the importance of not neglecting quality while pursuing yield. This point of view has profound implications not only for military manufacturing, but also for the entire manufacturing industry. Only under the premise of ensuring product quality can China's manufacturing industry truly occupy a dominant position in the international market and achieve sustainable development.
All in all, this article profoundly analyzes the history and fate of China's Type 63 rifle, and has a positive enlightenment for us to understand the current situation and future direction of the manufacturing industry. Today, with increasingly fierce global competition, China's manufacturing industry should pay more attention to innovation and quality, and move towards the path of high-quality development.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!