The situation has changed?The US warship flew to Japan, the US plane crashed into the sea, and the Japanese prime minister lost his voice.
The United States is the world's largest aviation power, and its flight accidents are also among the best in the world. Even the F-35,"Bumblebee"with"Black Hawk"Such an elite fighter of the United States has also had a major crash, and the F-35 has been encountered once in the world.
A US Air Force Osprey plane crashed near Yakushima, Japan, on 29 November. Eight beautiful people, one of whom has been confirmed dead, and the other seven are missing, their fate unknown. However, the US side has never disclosed any details about this accident, such as the personnel on the plane, their mission, and their training.
Surprisingly, by this time the US Department of Defense had already sent the USS Carl Vinson to Yakushima in Japan to begin a search operation. This move has aroused suspicion that in previous air crashes, the United States rarely used aircraft carriers for search and rescue.
There are several possibilities when the Ministry of Defense makes such a decision. First of all, there is a high probability that there are some important people on this plane, so the United States will send an aircraft carrier to look for this plane, the purpose is to create a false impression of "catching people, catching corpses". Second, when the plane crashes, it is very likely to carry some important materials and instruments, and in order to prevent these things from being snatched by others, the US side can only tow the plane to the shore by itself. Eventually, the United States may send a fleet to the Asia-Pacific region in the name of "searchers" to achieve its goal of a long-term presence in the region. Because the duration of rescue operations varies, the United States can have absolute control over the American side and be able to withdraw aircraft carriers at what time.
When we evaluate the situation, we should exercise caution and wait until the investigation of the incident is reported before we can obtain more accurate information. The actions of the US side still need more surveillance and wait for an official explanation.
The United States is paying more and more attention to this matter during the emergency rescue operation in the "Osprey" crash, and its abnormal behavior is bound to arouse more suspicions. From the standpoint of "family ugliness must not be publicized," even if the United States wants to alleviate the negative impression brought about by this incident, it will be difficult to do so. In addition, the U.S. aircraft carrier was also involved in the rescue operation, which will raise more questions about the accident and cause more damage to the reputation of the United States.
This scene made Japan a little speechless. First of all, the United States is still operating the "Osprey" plane on its own territory in disregard of Japan's request, which makes Japan very faceless. Today, American aircraft carriers are rushing to Japan, which clearly speaks of the complexity of this air crash, which has clearly lost its dominant position. It will be difficult for Japan to become involved in the affairs of the United States. It should be pointed out that Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has not expressed his stance on the United States since the plane crashed, as if he has acquiesced to the fact that "Japan has nothing to do with the United States." This not only puts Japan in a more disadvantageous position, but also gives the United States confidence in its unrestrained nature.
It can be said that the United States is indeed a bit reckless in dealing with the Japanese issue, and this is also an unequal contradiction between China and Japan. This, in the eyes of the Japanese, is an absolute tragedy. Overall, the litany of unusual actions by the United States suggests that the Osprey crash may be more intractable than we think. Whether there is any inside story in this depends on whether there is any new information in the future.
Everything we do is collected from the Internet, and there is no malice, no malice, and no malice. The relevant information and theories are collected from the Internet, and the above content does not mean that the writer is responsible for the laws, laws, opinions, actions and facts contained in the text. The author of this article is not responsible for the above or related issues and will not be held directly or indirectly legally responsible for this.