On December 12, 2023, Xiaomi released a statement on WB and other ** channels through its spokesperson, sparking a controversy about keel hinge technology. The statement accused Yu Chengdong, Huawei's consumer business chief, of making false remarks, unraveling the rivalry between the two tech giants, as well as disputes over technological innovation and intellectual property. This article will delve into the background of the dispute, relevant patent information, and how to resolve the patent dispute.
First of all, the dispute was caused by Yu Chengdong's false statements, but the statement did not elaborate on the specifics. As the CEO of Huawei's consumer business, Yu Chengdong's influence in the technology industry cannot be ignored. His remarks sparked a strong reaction from Xiaomi, which in turn triggered the outbreak of the whole incident.
At the center of this dispute is Xiaomi's keel hinge technology. Keel hinge technology, as a key technology of Xiaomi in mobile phone design and innovation, has attracted much attention. Yu Chengdong's false remarks about the technology escalated the controversy and pushed the competition between the two companies to the forefront. This incident is not only a wrestling between two major technology companies, but also involves deep thinking about technological innovation and intellectual property.
In order to gain insight into this dispute, we need to look at the patent information involved in the dispute. The patent number of Huawei's water drop hinge is CN116074415A, while the patent number of Xiaomi's keel hinge is CN212297248U. The revelation of the patent number makes the dispute more concrete, focusing on the technological innovation and patent rights contest between the two companies.
There are various ways to resolve patent disputes, the most common of which is negotiation. During the negotiation phase, the parties can reach an agreement through friendly negotiation and avoid lengthy legal procedures. However, negotiation requires the cooperation and compromise of both parties, and if an agreement cannot be reached, the next step may be the path of litigation.
Litigation is a formal way to resolve disputes. In court, a professional judge will review the arguments and evidence of both parties and make a final decision. Although litigation is a relatively just route, it has a long time period and high costs, so different companies and individuals often weigh the pros and cons before making a choice. In addition, administrative mediation is another way of resolving patent disputes. The patent administration department has the right to investigate, mediate and make decisions on patent infringement disputes.
This is a relatively quick and efficient approach, but the outcome of the mediation may still need to be confirmed by the court. Arbitration is an informal form of dispute resolution in which a dispute is decided by a panel of independent arbitrators. Arbitration is more expeditious and economical than litigation in court. Professional review is also a means of dispute resolution, and professional technical experts can be hired to conduct a review to help determine the validity and infringement of the patent.
In addition to formal channels, there are other ways to resolve the issue, such as mediation. Mediation is a more flexible method of resolving disputes conducted by a third-party mediator to help the parties find a common solution. Finally, cross-licensing is also a way to resolve patent disputes. Through cross-licensing agreements, both parties can license each other's patents to each other, thus avoiding further legal disputes and achieving a win-win situation.
In the process of resolving patent disputes, both parties need to work closely together to gather and prepare sufficient evidence to support their claims. This may include patent documents, technical comparative analysis, sales records, correspondence records, etc. It is also important to hire professional legal counsel or an IP lawyer to provide legal advice and support. Because in this battle of intellectual property, a full understanding of the legal requirements and technical expertise will help both parties find a fair and reasonable solution.
Overall, the patent dispute between Xiaomi and Huawei sheds light on the fierce competition and rapid technological innovation in the tech industry. Through an in-depth understanding of the course of this incident, we can see that in the field of intellectual property, how to resolve disputes involves a series of complex legal procedures and negotiation strategies, which provides useful inspiration for future technological development and enterprise competition.