The difference between the Chinese Academy of Engineering and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering are both the two major authorities in China's scientific and technological research, and enjoy a high reputation in China. They all have a rigorous academic evaluation system and have a very high status in various disciplines. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is mainly based on science and technology, and the Chinese Academy of Engineering is mainly based on engineering technology.
A unique experience of Shu Gequn, the contemporary party secretary of the Chinese Academy of Science and Technology.
Professor Shu Gequn worked in education and research at Tianjin University for many years, and later served as the Party Secretary of the University of Science and Technology of China. He has profound scientific research accumulation in the fields of engine design, waste heat and comprehensive application, and has made a series of major research results. Dr. Shu has completed more than 30 national and provincial projects, and has won the first prize of Tianjin Science and Technology Progress Award, the first prize of Tianjin Natural Science Award, and the second prize of National Science and Technology Progress Award.
In 2017, Dr. Shu was elected as the "Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. However, he was not chosen. However, this did not discourage him, and he ran again in 2021 as a researcher in the Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but unfortunately he did not do so. This is already his third academician election, but he may be directly affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, so he will participate in the selection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences this time.
Although Professor Shu was not elected as an academician, his achievements in this area are obvious to all. He is committed to education and scientific research, as well as to academic research and development.
The tragic achievements of the two universities of China Institute of Technology and Tianjin.
In addition to Professor Shu Gequn, there are 8 candidates for academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Tianjin University, all of whom are well-known scientific and technological workers in China. However, it is a bit regrettable that in the end, no one was selected.
This is a regrettable thing for Tianjin University. Tianjin University is a well-known and well-known university in China, which has always attached great importance to scientific research and discipline construction, and has an outstanding teaching team. However, the selection of the "Best Scholars" did not meet people's expectations.
The tragedy has also raised questions about the fairness and transparency of the selection mechanism. Some people have pointed out that in the evaluation process, there is a certain political color, so that some outstanding academic talents cannot be recognized as they deserve. Therefore, how should we build a fairer and more scientific academician selection system to ensure that outstanding academic talents are fairly judged and recognized?
Brief summary. Professor Shu Gequn regrettably lost his seat at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is the third time he has attended this conference, but all of them have failed. However, his academic contributions and achievements are obvious to all. He is mainly engaged in the research of engine structure, engine waste heat and comprehensive application, and has played a positive role in the progress of national science and technology.
At the same time, the academic candidates of Tianjin University, who participated in the nomination of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, also failed to do so. This has led to reflection and reflection on the academician selection system, and it is hoped that through the construction of a more fair and open evaluation system, outstanding scholars will be recognized and paid attention to. On this basis, it is necessary to further strengthen the fairness and transparency of the selection of scientific researchers, so as to facilitate the discovery and cultivation of high-quality scientific researchers and promote the progress of national science and technology.